Temporary Tattoo Ink: Does It Exist?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ink Tattoo
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the search for temporary tattoo ink that lasts around six months, with participants exploring the feasibility and existence of such products. While traditional temporary tattoos exist, like henna and transfer tattoos, the conversation highlights the challenges of creating a semi-permanent ink that can be applied with a needle. Concerns are raised about the fading process of tattoos, as well as the difficulty in achieving the right depth for ink application, which affects longevity and appearance. Participants note that many so-called temporary tattoos often last much longer than advertised, leading to skepticism about their true permanence. The idea of developing a non-toxic, dissolvable ink is mentioned, but the consensus is that current technology focuses on creating long-lasting pigments. The discussion also touches on personal motivations for getting tattoos and the cultural significance of tattooing, with some participants expressing doubts about the permanence of tattoos and suggesting alternatives like henna for those unsure about committing to a permanent design.
Messages
19,787
Reaction score
10,739
I have a friend who is interested in getting a tattoo but of course isn't sure she wants it for life. I tried researching "temporary tattoo ink", like something that last 6 months or so, but I couldn't really find anything. Does anyone have knowledge of a temporary ink? Does it exist? I have to imagine it does. Something that can be used with a needle.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Greg Bernhardt said:
I have a friend who is interested in getting a tattoo but of course isn't sure she wants it for life. I tried researching "temporary tattoo ink", like something that last 6 months or so, but I couldn't really find anything. Does anyone have knowledge of a temporary ink? Does it exist? I have to imagine it does. Something that can be used with a needle.
There are temporary tattoos that are rub ons from transfer paper to henna art as seen in India.
 
Evo said:
There are temporary tattoos that are rub ons from transfer paper to henna art as seen in India.

We are looking for a solution that can be applied with an ink gun and lasts several months :)
 
My advice, don't get a tattoo with the color black. Get light skin-tone pastels and white. That way, it will fade (a ton, trust me) in the sun, and it's easy to get removed later should you choose. How do I know? My old roommate owns a tattoo shop in our city, plus, I have some light colored tattoos that are almost invisible from my constant beach-going.

Generally, tattoos fade faster if the ink doesn't make it to the right layer of skin. Too deep and it's funny looking, too shallow and it bleeds out and fades fast. The problem with having an artist actually tattoo one with the intent for it to fade when the skin layers die is that it will look like crapola.
 
I should add that I am no professional tattoo artist or dermatologist, so take my advice with a grain of salt. Obviously do your research first, and any needle+skin tattoo that you get you should plan for it to be permanent just in case!
 
One of my friends had a 'temporary' tattoo done that was supposed to last a year or so. 10 years later it's still there!
 
cristo said:
One of my friends had a 'temporary' tattoo done that was supposed to last a year or so. 10 years later it's still there!

What is the difficultly in producing a temporary ink? You'd think it would be a gold mine if someone would develop one.
 
You might have better luck calling tattoo shops or even finding a tattoo forum. I have a hunch that this crowd might not be the most knowledgeable on tattoos.
 
KingNothing said:
You might have better luck calling tattoo shops or even finding a tattoo forum. I have a hunch that this crowd might not be the most knowledgeable on tattoos.

I thinking maybe there is a chemical side or biological side ya'll an help with on why this is difficult to create :)
 
  • #10
I thought tattoos being permanent is more to do with the process than the ink
 
  • #11
wukunlin said:
I thought tattoos being permanent is more to do with the process than the ink

So maybe the question is how long a tattoo would last one skin layer up from the Dermis?
 
  • #12
Greg Bernhardt said:
So maybe the question is how long a tattoo would last one skin layer up from the Dermis?
Hard to say, skin varies so widely from person to person. Some scar easliy, some don't. Some get permanent discoloration from sun exposure, some don't.

Maybe she should try a tiny tatto in an obscure place and see what happens. Of course this may mean waiting a year, by which time she may decide she doesn't really want a tattoo.
 
  • #13
Greg Bernhardt said:
What is the difficultly in producing a temporary ink? You'd think it would be a gold mine if someone would develop one.
There might be a market for tattoos that fade away but R&D in pigments generally looks for the opposite: pigments that will last forever. There are paintings from the renaissance, for example, where some of the colors have changed into ugly, strange shades. Everyone wants to avoid that, so people who engineer new pigments are always shooting for permanence.

In the case of tattoos there would be the additional problem of everything having to be non-toxic.
So maybe the question is how long a tattoo would last one skin layer up from the Dermis?

This kind of precision depth control is probably beyond the skills of a tattoo artist with a hand held gun.

Wiki says all gun made "temporary" tattoos are not:

Some practitioners offer tattoos that they claim to be temporary, but will last for a period of years rather than days. These are applied using a tattoo gun, and are therefore the closest substitute for the permanent tattoo experience, including the discomfort. These tattoos are supposed to gradually fade away over time, leaving no trace. Some tattoo artists claim that the inks are inserted closer to the surface, allowing them to gradually slough off, while others claim to use special inks that naturally disperse over time.
There is some discrepancy as to whether these semi-permanent tattoos are in fact "temporary tattoos" at all. In practice, semi-permanent tattoos have had mixed results, and caution would say that any tattoo performed by inserting pigment under the skin should be considered permanent.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temporary_tattoo

I have heard of sharpie artists who can draw a credible tattoo on the surface that will slowly wash away over time.

The main trouble with the idea of a temporary tattoo, it seems to me, is that for the bulk of its life it will be in "fade" mode. You'd be walking around with a faded tattoo for a much longer time than it was rich and colorful.
 
  • #14
zoobyshoe said:
The main trouble with the idea of a temporary tattoo, it seems to me, is that for the bulk of its life it will be in "fade" mode. You'd be walking around with a faded tattoo for a much longer time than it was rich and colorful.

This is a very interesting point!
 
  • #15
Greg Bernhardt said:
I have a friend who is interested in getting a tattoo but of course isn't sure she wants it for life. I tried researching "temporary tattoo ink", like something that last 6 months or so, but I couldn't really find anything. Does anyone have knowledge of a temporary ink? Does it exist? I have to imagine it does. Something that can be used with a needle.
If she's not sure she wants it for life, then, imho, she shouldn't get it. There are much more interesting and important things to worry over (again, only imho).
 
  • #16
It would be nice if they could invent an ink that is permanent, but which dissolves using some chemical.
Say you drink a potion and gone is the tattoo!

Isn't it already possible to remove existing tattoos with chemicals up to some extent?
 
  • #17
I like Serena said:
It would be nice if they could invent an ink that is permanent, but which dissolves using some chemical.
Say you drink a potion and gone is the tattoo!

Isn't it already possible to remove existing tattoos with chemicals up to some extent?
Why would anyone get a tattoo if they weren't entirely and irrevocably commited to the content/message of the tattoo?
 
  • #18
ThomasT said:
Why would anyone get a tattoo if they weren't entirely and irrevocably commited to the content/message of the tattoo?

Erm... because it looks pretty and is considered cool by some?
 
  • #19
I've known lots of people with tattoos. Based on that experience, my humble (and maybe wrong, I don't know) opinion is that these people have some sort of internal insecurity or dissatisfaction with themselves. But of course, I don't know what they're thinking. I don't know what motivates them.

I ask myself: why do people allow themselves to be tattooed? Why do they want to be tattooed? I have some ideas, but nothing that I would consider definitive.

Personally, imho, I think it's stupid/silly/immature -- not well thought out. And, come to think of it, all of the people who I know who have tattoos are, imo, stupid/silly/immature wrt the tattoos and also wrt their general behavior --which is not to say that they aren't also lovable and good friends and trustworthy.
 
  • #20
I like Serena said:
Erm... because it looks pretty and is considered cool by some?
I guess it depends on what one thinks looks pretty and whose opinions one is compelled by.
 
  • #21
Just to be clear. I don't have any tattoos, and will never get a tattoo. In my very humble, and perhaps wrong, opinion, tattoos are just silly considerations that I, personally, am not at all troubled with.
 
  • #22
ThomasT said:
Why would anyone get a tattoo if they weren't entirely and irrevocably commited to the content/message of the tattoo?

I don't see why permanence of the tattoo is some sort of inherent requirement. If I dye my hair blond, that doesn't mean I want my hair blond for life. If I wear a t-shirt with a funny saying, I want to be able to take it off at the end of the day.
 
  • #23
Greg Bernhardt said:
I don't see why permanence of the tattoo is some sort of inherent requirement. If I dye my hair blond, that doesn't mean I want my hair blond for life. If I wear a t-shirt with a funny saying, I want to be able to take it off at the end of the day.
Yeah, but you're asking about nonpermanent tattoos (administered subcutaneously). I don't think there is such a thing. So, getting an ink tattoo administered by needle is sort of a big consideration. That is, if one decides that one doesn't want it at some point, then the only option is to have it cut out. Ouch! And a nasty scar.

The option is surface tattoos that wash off -- but you seemed to dismiss those.
 
  • #24
ThomasT said:
That is, if one decides that one doesn't want it at some point, then the only option is to have it cut out. Ouch! And a nasty scar.
No, they remove them with lasers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aRgLUoJdcOU
 
  • #25
zoobyshoe said:
No, they remove them with lasers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aRgLUoJdcOU
Ok then ... get the tattoo. :smile: By the way, I forgot about, wasn't thinking about, the artistic aspect of it. If getting tattooed is the avenue of artistic (or whatever) expression that one feels one must take, then ... there's no arguing with that I guess.
 
  • #26
zoobyshoe said:
No, they remove them with lasers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aRgLUoJdcOU
Doesn't that leave a bad scar?
 
  • #27
Last edited:
  • #28
My wife likes the henna "tattoos" because they can be quite detailed and impermanent. She attended the birthday party of one of our neighbors' grand-daughters, and the girls insisted that she get "tattoos" like they had. Those decals took a long time to fade. People at work even asked her why she had gotten a tattoo. Perhaps there are some companies that can create custom transfers like that...

BTW, I read somewhere that the actress that plays Abby on NCIS owns most of the tattoos that she wears, but that the spider-web tattoo on her neck is applied by make-up before each shoot.
 
Last edited:
  • #29
ThomasT said:
Ok then ... get the tattoo. :smile:
No, the laser removal is not ideal. There seems often to be a smudgy ghost of the tattoo left over.
By the way, I forgot about, wasn't thinking about, the artistic aspect of it. If getting tattooed is the avenue of artistic (or whatever) expression that one feels one must take, then ... there's no arguing with that I guess.
Tattoo art is associated with certain Art genres, yes, but "or whatever" is more like it; it's more about fitting in with a sub-culture (an increasingly larger one, to be sure) than about artistic expression. The person getting the tattoo is rarely the artist or designer. Their function is more like 'curator' or editor, choosing what artwork and where, but not actually doing the artwork.
 
  • #30
turbo said:
BTW, I read somewhere that the actress that plays Abby on NCIS owns most of the tattoos that she wears, but that the spider-web tattoo on her neck is applied by make-up before each shoot.
I thought that actress was in her twenties for the longest time. Turns out she's in her forties.
 
  • #31
You can try for henna tattoo. But this tattoo is maximum for one month. These are temporary tattoo with no harmful effect.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top