Tensile and compressive forces

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about tensile and compressive forces related to a tightrope walker, it is clarified that the weight of the walker creates tension in the rope, which acts away from the point of weight application. Compressive forces are not present because a rope cannot be pushed; thus, only tensile forces are relevant. For the tightrope walker to be in static equilibrium, the sum of all forces must equal zero, with equal horizontal components canceling each other out and vertical components balancing the weight of the walker. This results in no net force acting on the walker, confirming the principles of static equilibrium. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of the misunderstanding regarding compressive forces.
MBBphys
Gold Member
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Example of a tightrope walker:
Figure_04_05_06.jpg

Now, the weight force acts at a point. The rope is stretched. Compressive forces act inwards towards that point (opposite to TL and TR, the tensile forces). The resultant of the compressive forces equals the weight and is in the same direction – the weight force CAUSES the compressive forces.

If the man is stable on the tightrope and not moving, then resultant force is zero.

As string is stretched, tension forces act away from the point where weight acts (see image above). These are labelled TL and TR. The resultant of the tensile forces equals the weight in magnitude, but acts in the opposite direction, producing zero net force.

Is my understanding correct? Thanks in advance for your reply :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MBBphys said:
Example of a tightrope walker:
Figure_04_05_06.jpg

Now, the weight force acts at a point. The rope is stretched. Compressive forces act inwards towards that point (opposite to TL and TR, the tensile forces). The resultant of the compressive forces equals the weight and is in the same direction – the weight force CAUSES the compressive forces.

What compressive forces? The wire is placed in tension by the weight of the walker.

You should know from experience that you can't push on a rope. Since you can't push on a rope, there is no compressive force.
If the man is stable on the tightrope and not moving, then resultant force is zero.
That is why it's called static equilibrium.
As string is stretched, tension forces act away from the point where weight acts (see image above). These are labelled TL and TR. The resultant of the tensile forces equals the weight in magnitude, but acts in the opposite direction, producing zero net force.

The weight of the walker causes the line to deflect downward. The tensile force in each half of the rope can be resolved into a horizontal and a vertical component.

For static equilibrium to occur, the sum of all these forces must equal zero.

The two horizontal components are of equal magnitude acting in opposite directions, so their net force is zero.
The sum of the vertical components of the tensile forces in the rope must equal the weight of the walker, and these components act in the opposite direction to the weight of the walker, so the net force in the vertical direction is zero.

The sum of the forces in the horizontal and vertical directions is zero, therefore, the walker is in static equilibrium.
 
  • Like
Likes billy_joule and Chestermiller
SteamKing said:
What compressive forces? The wire is placed in tension by the weight of the walker.

You should know from experience that you can't push on a rope. Since you can't push on a rope, there is no compressive force.

That is why it's called static equilibrium.The weight of the walker causes the line to deflect downward. The tensile force in each half of the rope can be resolved into a horizontal and a vertical component.

For static equilibrium to occur, the sum of all these forces must equal zero.

The two horizontal components are of equal magnitude acting in opposite directions, so their net force is zero.
The sum of the vertical components of the tensile forces in the rope must equal the weight of the walker, and these components act in the opposite direction to the weight of the walker, so the net force in the vertical direction is zero.

The sum of the forces in the horizontal and vertical directions is zero, therefore, the walker is in static equilibrium.
Ah yes I get why I was wrong; thanks so much for your help :)
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top