Tension At Two Points With Acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a painter using a pulley system to lift himself, requiring a force calculation to achieve a specific upward acceleration. The painter and chair combined have a mass of 100 kg, and the user applies the formula F=MA to determine the necessary tension in the rope. The user adds the desired acceleration (0.20 m/s²) to the acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m/s²), resulting in a total acceleration of 10.0 m/s². The derived tension formula, T=(M(g+a))/2, yields a calculated force of 500 N. The user seeks validation of this approach and solution before finalizing their homework submission.
myxomatosii
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am here to ask a check to my work, I think that I have the idea down but I would like if someone could look over my concept and see if I am seeing things right as on my homework I used 3/5 of my attempts at the solution brashly without thinking, like a moron, I would like to check my next attempt here before I apply it there. :wink:

Homework Statement



A house painter uses the chair and pulley arrangement of Figure P8.42 to lift himself up the side of a house. The painter's mass is 90 kg and the chair's mass is 10 kg. With what force must he pull down on the rope in order to accelerate upward at 0.20 m/s^2?

http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/8056/p842.gif

Homework Equations


I believe the only formula needed is simple F=MA. F being the force of Tension. So I will say T=MA.

The Attempt at a Solution


First, forget the pully, man and chair.

Its just a mass of 100kg pulling itself up from a support point by another support point.

I believe to solve the problem I should take the acceleration(a) which I am trying to cause on the mass(M) and add it to the acceleration due to gravity(g), causing the total(A) to be 10.0m/s^2.

There, we have A and M. Simple.

The equation we could use to write this problem out (if we so chose at this point) would be.

2T=M(g+a) therefore T=(M(g+a))/2

Which gave me 500N.

I can't find a logic flaw, hopefully if there is one then you can.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
seems ok to me
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top