Tension in rope between falling objects

AI Thread Summary
To find the tension in the rope between two falling objects of mass m, consider the forces acting on each object: tension and gravitational force. Each object experiences gravitational acceleration, and since they are connected, they will share the same acceleration. The equations of motion for both objects must be set up separately, accounting for the forces acting on each. Notably, the mutual gravitational force between the two masses can be neglected as it is significantly smaller than the gravitational forces acting on them from Earth. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately calculating the tension in the rope.
team31
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Two point-lie objects, each with mass m, are connected by a massless rope of length l. The objects are suspened vertically near the surface of Earth, so that one object is hanging below the other. Then the objects are released. How can I find the tension in the rope?
I know there 3 force, tension, Graviational Froce on each block. but how can I set them up?
my first thought was (M*m*G)/(R^2)+(M*m*G)/((R+l)^2)-T-(m*m*G)/(l^2)=(2m)G/(R^2). I know it's wrong but I don't know where's my mistake.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, I think it is sufficient to assume R^2 = (R+l)^2.

Secondly, there are two equations of motion (one for each particle), not just one, and in each equation you consider only the forces acting the given particle. On the lower particle you have 2 forces: tension up and gravity down. Similarly for the upper particle.

The most important observation to make is that if there is tension in the rope at all, the particles will accelerate with the same acceleration. This can be seen by noticing that the z-positions of the bodies differ by a constant (the length of the rope).
 
so is that the graviational force between the tow mass is counted as part of the tension
 
I see... I would tend to neglect the mutual gravitation of the two particles. It seems to me to be much smaller than the other quantities involved.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top