Tension on a box made of stretchable material

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the tension in a stretchable material when forces are applied from both sides. The tension created is identified as F, not 2F, leading to an extension of delta when measured from end to end. If measured from the center, each end moves by delta/2, but the total extension remains the same. The effective "spring constant" is doubled when considering only half of the material, resulting in a proportional relationship between force and extension. Understanding these principles clarifies the differing opinions on the extension caused by the applied forces.
Yuppy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Please take a look at the slides attached.

Suppose I apply a force F on the right hand side and another on the left hand side as shown in the following diagram. Suppose that the material can be stretched. Now one of my friends said that the extension is delta due to a force F while another friend said it is 2delta and they both gave me their reasons. The next slides shows their reasoning. Could you please tell me which reasoning is right?
 

Attachments

  • Slide1.JPG
    Slide1.JPG
    34.9 KB · Views: 397
  • Slide2.JPG
    Slide2.JPG
    34.8 KB · Views: 369
Physics news on Phys.org
Yuppy said:
Now one of my friends said that the extension is delta due to a force F while another friend said it is 2delta and they both gave me their reasons.
The tension created is F, not 2F. The extension, which is measured from end to end, is due to the tension F. If you measure from the center, then each end moves delta/2, of course. The total end-to-end extension is the same no matter how you think of it.

Point out to your second friend that if you measure from the center, the effective "spring constant" of the material is twice as much--since you are looking at only half of it--thus the extension of each end from the center is just half of the total extension.

Make sense?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top