Terminal Velocity of a Falling Parachutist

AI Thread Summary
The calculation of terminal velocity for a falling parachutist was initially attempted using an incorrect equation, leading to an erroneous result of 50 m/s. The discussion highlights confusion regarding the role of initial velocity and its impact on terminal velocity, questioning whether it should remain constant regardless of initial conditions. It is clarified that weight (W) is distinct from mass and that air resistance is influenced by weight. The thread also notes the importance of correct units in physics calculations, emphasizing that velocity must have appropriate units. Ultimately, the focus shifts to the idea that the problem is more about manipulating formulas than applying physical principles.
Saptarshi Sarkar
Messages
98
Reaction score
13
Homework Statement
A parachutist is falling with a speed of 55m/s when his parachute opens. The total weight of the man and the parachute is W and the air resistance is Wv²/25 N, where v is the instantaneous velocity. The terminal velocity is

A) 10m/s
B) 5m/s
C) 11m/s
D) zero
Relevant Equations
W d²y/dt² = Wg - Wv²/25
I tried to calculate it by the way I know, i.e., setting the right hand side of the equation of motion to zero and getting

v² = 25g = 2500 (taking g =10)
=> v = 50m/s

But this answer is incorrect. How do I use the information of the initial velocity and why would it effect the terminal velocity? Shouldn't the terminal velocity be the same no matter what the initial velocity was?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
W is the weight, not the mass.
 
  • Like
Likes Saptarshi Sarkar
TSny said:
W is the weight, not the mass.

Thanks! I can't believe I did that mistake.
 
Also, 25g = 250, not 2500.
 
  • Like
Likes Saptarshi Sarkar
This raises another question. Why would the air resistance depend upon W?
 
This thread is about 3.5 years old. The original poster has not been seen for the last 1.5 years. We can probably ignore the problematic relationship of air resistance to weight.

We can also ignore the erroneout units of measurement specified in the problem statement. Velocity has units. It is not a pure number.

Clearly the problem is an exercise in formula manipulation, not physics.
 
  • Like
Likes dlgoff and berkeman
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top