Terminal velocity when falling through the atmosphere

AI Thread Summary
A sky-diver reaches terminal velocity when the force of air resistance equals her weight, making option A the correct answer. The discussion highlights that while air density decreases with altitude, this does not affect the state of terminal velocity, which is defined as a constant condition. The confusion arises from questioning the premise of terminal velocity rather than addressing the question directly. Ultimately, the focus should remain on the established physics principles rather than hypothetical scenarios. Understanding terminal velocity is crucial for accurate assessments in physics problems.
JimT
Dear all,

I have been working my way through the Oxford University physics test sample paper http://www.physics.ox.ac.uk/admissions/combined-sample.pdf" and I have come across this question:

A sky-diver jumps out of an aeroplane. Which of the following statements is true after she reaches terminal velocity?
A The force of air resistance is the same size as her weight.
B The force of air resistance is larger than her weight.
C The force of air resistance is smaller than her weight.
D She begins to slow down.

Now my initial answer would be A however, after thinking about it would I be correct in believing that the answer would be in fact D as air density decreases with increase in altitude? The net force, if the sky-diver stayed at a constant terminal velocity, would steadily become greater in magnitude (after reaching initial terminal velocity) in the upwards direction as a result of increased air resistance due to an increase in air density. To resolve this net difference, the sky-diver's velocity would decrease thus lowering drag until the net force=0?

Would that be correct? As far as I can see, both A and D are true.

Best wishes,
James
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is true enough that the density of air changes somewhat with altitude, yet the PREMISE of this exercise is that she HAS reached terminal velocity, which is therefore terminal, i.e, final and CONSTANT.

What has confused you is rather the question "Is the premise justifiable in the first place?"

As it happens, it IS justified, and your uncertainty is misplaced, but far more important is that it is an irrelevant concern to the given question.
 
Okay, thanks that's super.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top