Terminology for (anti)symmetric tensors in characteristic 2

Hurkyl
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
14,922
Reaction score
28
When working over a field of characteristic not 2, or otherwise with modules over a ring where 2 is invertible, there is no ambiguity in what one means by symmetric or anti-symmetric rank 2 tensors. All of definitions of the anti-symmetric tensors
  • The module of anti-symmetric tensors is the quotient of M \otimes M by the relations x \otimes y = -(y \otimes x).
  • The module of anti-symmetric tensors is the quotient of M \otimes M by the relations x \otimes x = 0.
  • The module of anti-symmetric tensors is the image of the anti-symmetrization operation x \otimes y \mapsto (1/2)(x \otimes y - y \otimes x) on M \otimes M
  • The module of anti-symmetric tensors is the kernel of the symmetrization operation x \otimes y \mapsto (1/2)(x \otimes y + y \otimes x)
give the same module, and there is a standard notation for it: \wedge^2 M or M \wedge M.

Similarly for symmetric tensors.



When 2 is not invertible, the different definitions can give different groups. Is there standard terminology and notation for the various possibilities? The only one I'm aware of is that the module \wedge^2 M refers to the second in the list of definitions above. :frown:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the characteristic is ##2##, then you normally adjust the definition accordingly. E.g. instead of demanding anti-commutativity of a Lie algebra, ##[X,Y]=-[Y,X]## we demand ##[X,X]=0## instead. This is the more general case which covers all characteristics, since ##0=[X+Y,X+Y]=[X,Y]+[Y,X]## gets the usual definition from the general one.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top