Tesla Powerwall: Engineering Analysis

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Tesla Powerwall, a lithium-ion battery designed for energy storage, priced at $3500 for 10 kWh. Participants explore its potential applications, market viability, and economic implications, particularly in residential settings. The conversation touches on concepts of energy storage, time-of-use pricing, and off-grid living.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether the Powerwall is a gimmick, niche market product, or a disruptive technology.
  • There is discussion about the intended purpose of the Powerwall, specifically storing energy at night when it is cheaper and using it during the day when prices are higher.
  • Others argue that the current lack of a residential market for this concept limits its utility, as it relies on variable electric rates.
  • Concerns are raised about whether 7 kW is sufficient to power air conditioning and other household needs, suggesting that multiple units may be necessary for off-grid living.
  • Some participants propose that the Powerwall could also be used to store energy generated from solar panels during the day for use at night.
  • There is a mention of the potential for cost savings through time-of-use pricing, but skepticism exists regarding the actual economic benefits for consumers.
  • Participants discuss the implications of utility companies not adopting similar energy storage solutions at scale, questioning the cost-effectiveness of such technologies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no clear consensus on the effectiveness or market viability of the Powerwall. Some agree on its potential for off-grid users, while others highlight significant limitations and uncertainties regarding its practical applications and economic feasibility.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the effectiveness of the Powerwall may depend on specific electric rate structures and regional energy needs, which vary widely. The discussion also highlights the lack of clarity around the integration of solar energy and the overall cost-effectiveness of the system.

  • #91
Kafzilla said:
A side question, could one hook one of these up with a generator and charge with the unused power?

Sure. I imagine that batteries in combination with on site generation are very attractive.

Remember that not all locations have net metering where you sell excess power back to the utility, nor are all users on the grid. On-site energy storsge is most attractive to those users.

I think the solar/storage combination is attractive. Once you have a solar installation, you already bought the inverter, mandatory grid interface (if any), and installation labor. The incremental cost to add additional panels is small. Combine that with the cost of adding battery storage, and the economics are compelling.

Where net metering is available, the grid acts as your storage battery at no charge. That is why I think net metering is not sustainable.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #92
i have question that how can we increase the output voltage 90vdc to 200v if we are having the input voltage 220v ac?
 
  • #93
The DC to AC inverter will boost the voltage. It has an internal transformer.
 
  • #94
anorlunda said:
By the way, the world's biggest utility battery installation is in Fairbanks Alaska.
That facility was build with Ni-Cads in 2006 (45 MW, 4 MWh). The new largest in N. America is li-ion based and eight times larger, http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/The-Biggest-Battery-in-North-America-Gets-Unveiled-By-SCE-Today in California.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #95
anorlunda said:
They are required to pay whatever it takes to buy all the energy needed to satisfy the demand, not matter what the price.
Also, in many places utilities are required by the state to buy a quota of certain types of power, specifically renewable power (aka RPS).
 
  • #96
mheslep said:
That facility was build with Ni-Cads in 2006 (45 MW, 4 MWh). The new largest in N. America is li-ion based and eight times larger, 32 MWh, in California.

Thank you mheslep, I was not aware of the California installation. In another recent thread, Batteries for utility storage, I found news of a battery facility under construction in Austrailia with 50 MW. 300 MWh . Maybe we'll see more wide spread use of utility batteries in the future.

I'm curious about choice of chemistry. For utility applicaitons, volumetric or mass energy density sounds unimportant. Their lifetime measured in cycles may be similar. Is it simply $/MWH that determines the choice?

mheslep said:
Also, in many places utilities are required by the state to buy a quota of certain types of power, specifically renewable power (aka RPS).

But batteries are not an energy source, just energy storage. Do purchases of battery power count as renewable? It sounds complex, because you have to figure the source of energy used to charge the battery.

I would also add, that the location of the generation is sometimes also a requirement. For example, Manhattan Island in NYC, where some fraction of reserves must be on-island.
 
  • #97
anorlunda said:
Is it simply $/MWH that determines the choice?
amortized capital cost of storage $/MWh, efficiency, and $/MW, i.e. cost for storage, cost of wasted generated energy, and cost of rate of charge/discharge. The last may or may not add to the total cost.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
9K
Replies
35
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
3K