Testing a Relativity Simulator

TestTubeGames
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I've been working on a Special Relativity simulation/game, and I'm interested in getting some feedback.

Basically, it is a flash game that incorporates time dilation, length contraction, and so on. I'm hoping that it will be a fun way to make these abstract (and confusing) ideas hands-on. But for all that, I need to make sure that:

a)The physics is correct - no glaring misapplications of relativity
b)It is enlightening - not just a confusing jumble of weird physics

PM me if you're interested in testing out the game. I'm looking from feedback from both categories (so from both experts and amateurs). Thanks!

-Andy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TestTubeGames said:
I've been working on a Special Relativity simulation/game, and I'm interested in getting some feedback.

Basically, it is a flash game that incorporates time dilation, length contraction, and so on. I'm hoping that it will be a fun way to make these abstract (and confusing) ideas hands-on. But for all that, I need to make sure that:

a)The physics is correct - no glaring misapplications of relativity
b)It is enlightening - not just a confusing jumble of weird physics

PM me if you're interested in testing out the game. I'm looking from feedback from both categories (so from both experts and amateurs). Thanks!

-Andy

Hi, I think it would be interesting to test your simulator, provided that I can run it on my ordinary computer.


Regards,

Erland
 
have fun getting the mathematics to not bog down your game, if I recall the black hole merger simulations had a similar problem but were able to overcome it. So take heart in that much. I would be interested also in testing the game out.
 
Mordred said:
have fun getting the mathematics to not bog down your game, if I recall the black hole merger simulations had a similar problem but were able to overcome it. So take heart in that much. I would be interested also in testing the game out.

Yes, I've got to say, streamlining the math was no easy task. Knowing how to calculate a single, symmetrical solution for a problem set is hard enough. Generalizing it to a simulation was tougher than I even imagined. Then making it run smoothly, phew! Certainly a fun challenge, though.

I appreciate that you're willing to take a look. As confusing as relativity is, I'd hate to have messed up somewhere in the sim, and be distributing further confusion to the masses.

I'll send both of you a private message with details on testing the game. Thanks!
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Back
Top