Textbook of "introduction to mathematical thinking"

AI Thread Summary
For those self-studying mathematical thinking at the undergraduate level, several textbooks are highly recommended. "How to Study as a Mathematics Major" by Lara Alcock provides foundational strategies for approaching mathematical concepts. "Book of Proof" by Richard Hammack is frequently suggested for first-year students and is available for free, making it accessible for self-learners, complete with solutions for practice. Another notable text is "How to Think about Analysis," also by Alcock, which revisits calculus from a mathematical perspective. Engaging with these texts is emphasized, particularly through the practice of reading and writing proofs, which is crucial for deepening understanding. Revisiting earlier mathematical topics not only reinforces prior knowledge but also aids in preparing for exams like the GRE. The importance of actively engaging with textbooks and practicing proofs is highlighted as essential for mastering mathematical concepts.
Mathsway
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Hi everyone
I was wondering does anyone know any good first year undergraduate textbook of 'introduction to mathematical thinking' for self-studying ? thks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would suggest going through these books in order to get a nice introduction to mathematical thinking, proofs and analysis (which is a revisit of calculus but through the eyes of a mathematician as opposed to someone who might be learning calculus as a tool to solve problems, like an engineer or physicist.)

How to Study as a Mathematics Major, Lara Alcock
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0199661316/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Book of Proof, Richard Hammack (free, frequently recommended for 1st year undergrads and has solutions available for self study)
http://www.people.vcu.edu/~rhammack/BookOfProof/

How to Think about Analysis, Lara Alcock
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0198723539/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
Last edited by a moderator:
hi ibkev
Thank you for the quick reply. I will certainly check it out.

:oldsmile::thumbup:
 
  • Like
Likes ibkev
Best way, is to due to many proofs.

Try to revisit earlier mathematical content. This is great for two reasons.

(1)Great review of older material. Helps with the eventual GRE. You will find out how much information was not understood the first time.
(2)Since the material is something you are familiar with, you will have easier time reading, and writing proofs of something known.

I learned to read and write proofs from: Reading all of my textbooks throughout my education. Engage the textbook!
I re learned geometry from: Geometry: Moise/Downs, restudied Linear Algebra from Anton( reading, doing, and doing the proofs on my own). I later moved into more advance material.

I cannot stress the trying and doing proofs enough.

The explanation that Moise gives for Existence and Uniqueness is very GOOD. It was something I did not grasp until reading this basic, but good book.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...
Back
Top