The acceleration of a bubble in water

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the initial acceleration of a bubble in water, which is stated to be 2g, where g is gravitational acceleration. Participants express confusion over deriving this equation and seek clarification on the underlying physics. References to specific problems in academic sources are shared, but there is acknowledgment that the assumptions made, such as negligible viscosity, complicate understanding. Some participants suggest following detailed steps in the references to clarify the derivation. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for clear explanations and derivations to understand the acceleration of bubbles in fluid dynamics.
Istvan01
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a question about a rising bubble.
I read that the initial acceleration of a bubble (with negligible mass) in water is 2g, where g is the gravitational acceleration. I understand that if a bubble rise then the water move around it, but I can't derive this equation.
Could someone help me out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I see no reasonable argument for this statement.
What is your reference and what does it say to justify such a claim ?
 
Istvan01 said:
I read that ...

This requires a clear reference to the source.

Zz.
 
Looking at the pdf file, the problem 52 seems to assume that the liquid has no viscosity, which isn't true in general.
 
I did find a 2g here but don't see an explanation. And here it gets worse: 3.3 g ! But they do show how the 2g comes about in section 2 (of course :smile:). So your derivation is available.

Must admit I learned to be a bit more open-minded: at first I didn't believe more than g is physically possible...

This one below ? I don't see it. But then again: you say the answer is 2. So: follow the steps and see where you end up
Help us help you and post your working ...

upload_2018-6-26_17-57-58.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-6-26_17-57-58.png
    upload_2018-6-26_17-57-58.png
    52.8 KB · Views: 580
Thanks, I'm not certain that I can understand your reference because that seems very complicated but I'll try
 

Similar threads

Back
Top