The amplitude of a forced undamped ocillation

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter anonymous24
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amplitude
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of forced undamped oscillations, particularly focusing on the amplitude response when the driving frequency does not match the natural frequency of the system. Participants explore theoretical aspects, mathematical formulations, and intuitive understandings related to simple harmonic motion and resonance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that in a damped forced oscillation, the amplitude decreases exponentially over time, while in an undamped situation, the amplitude can grow uncontrollably when the driving frequency matches the natural frequency.
  • There is a question regarding the behavior of amplitude when the driving frequency is not matched, with some suggesting it may still increase over time but at a lower rate.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of solving the equations of motion to understand the system's behavior, providing mathematical formulations for the general and particular solutions.
  • Another participant clarifies that the displacement in a forced oscillation is the sum of a steady simple harmonic oscillation at the driver frequency and a damped oscillation at the system's natural frequency, with only the damped component dying away over time.
  • Concerns are raised about the idealization of undamped systems, with a participant suggesting that real systems are always damped to some degree, which complicates the understanding of forced oscillations.
  • There is a discussion about the analogy between mechanical systems and electrical circuits, particularly in relation to resonance and energy coupling.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of undamped oscillations and the role of damping in real systems. There is no consensus on the behavior of amplitude when the driving frequency is not matched, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the practical implications of these theoretical concepts.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion regarding terminology, particularly the use of "circuit" in the context of mechanical systems. The discussion also highlights the idealization of undamped systems and the limitations of applying these concepts to real-world scenarios.

anonymous24
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
Hello,
We learned in class that for a simple harmonic damped forced oscillation, the amplitude decreased exponentially over time. And for a completely undamped situation, the amplitude grows uncontrollably when the driver frequency matches the natural frequency of the driven. However, I wonder what will happen if the driver and driven frequency is not matched in an undamped situation. Would the amplitude also increase over time as no energy is lost but at a lower rate than when they match? Thank you in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
anonymous24 said:
Hello,
We learned in class that for a damped forced oscillation, the amplitude decreased exponentially over time. And for a completely undamped situation, the amplitude grows uncontrollably when the driver frequency matches the natural frequency of the driven. However, I wonder what will happen if the driver and driven frequency is not matched in an undamped situation. Would the amplitude also increase over time as no energy is lost but at a lower rate than when they match? Thank you in advance.
In the undamped condition, the Q of the circuit is infinite and the bandwidth is zero, so a generator which differs in frequency cannot couple energy into the resonant circuit.
 
Just solve the equations of motion:
$$\ddot{x}+\omega^2 x=A \exp(-\mathrm{i} \Omega t).$$
At the end we take the real part to get a real solution.

The general solution is the general solution of the homogeneous equation,
$$x_h(t)=C_1 \exp(-\mathrm{i} \omega t)+C_2 \exp(\mathrm{i} \omega t),$$
plus any particular solution of the inhomogeneous equation. Physically it's clear that the ansatz
$$x(t)=C \exp(-\mathrm{i} \Omega t)$$
should lead to a solution. Now it's easy for you to find the solution yourself.

Also the particular solution of the singular case of resonance, i.e., ##\Omega=\omega## can be found by taking the limit ##\Omega \rightarrow \omega## at fixed initial conditions (e.g., choosing as initial conditions ##x(0)=\dot{x}(0)=0##).
 
tech99 said:
In the undamped condition, the Q of the circuit is infinite and the bandwidth is zero, so a generator which differs in frequency cannot couple energy into the resonant circuit.
Thank you for your reply but sorry I don't understand what do you mean by circuit. I meant in a simple harmonic system. Perhaps I should edit my post.
 
vanhees71 said:
Just solve the equations of motion:
$$\ddot{x}+\omega^2 x=A \exp(-\mathrm{i} \Omega t).$$
At the end we take the real part to get a real solution.

The general solution is the general solution of the homogeneous equation,
$$x_h(t)=C_1 \exp(-\mathrm{i} \omega t)+C_2 \exp(\mathrm{i} \omega t),$$
plus any particular solution of the inhomogeneous equation. Physically it's clear that the ansatz
$$x(t)=C \exp(-\mathrm{i} \Omega t)$$
should lead to a solution. Now it's easy for you to find the solution yourself.

Also the particular solution of the singular case of resonance, i.e., ##\Omega=\omega## can be found by taking the limit ##\Omega \rightarrow \omega## at fixed initial conditions (e.g., choosing as initial conditions ##x(0)=\dot{x}(0)=0##).

I really appreciate the effort you put into your response but solving differential equations like this may be a bit out of my reach as I'm still in high school. Is there an intuitive way to approach this?
 
anonymous24 said:
We learned in class that for a simple harmonic damped forced oscillation, the amplitude decreased exponentially over time.
I'm afraid you're a bit confused here. The displacement of the system is the sum of (1) a steady simple harmonic oscillation at the frequency of the driver, and (2) a damped oscillation at the system's natural frequency. It's only (2) that dies away, leaving (1) as the 'steady state', constant amplitude response. In vanhees71's reply, xh(t) is (2) and x(t) is (1).
 
Philip Wood said:
I'm afraid you're a bit confused here. The displacement of the system is the sum of (1) a steady simple harmonic oscillation at the frequency of the driver, and (2) a damped oscillation at the system's natural frequency. It's only (2) that dies away, leaving (1) as the 'steady state', constant amplitude response. In vanhees71's reply, xh(t) is (2) and x(t) is (1).
Thank you for your response, it does clear up the confusion. Would undamped oscillation also return to steady state over time?
 
No, but do bear in mind that real systems are damped to some degree. An undamped system is an idealisation, and one that may not be very helpful when trying to understand forced oscillations.
 
anonymous24 said:
Thank you for your reply but sorry I don't understand what do you mean by circuit. I meant in a simple harmonic system. Perhaps I should edit my post.
Sorry, I now realize you are studying mechanical systems, but the same happens with an electrical circuit having an inductor and a capacitor.
Intuitively, you may know that a wine glass will resonate and shatter if a singer hits the exact resonant frequency. But because the damping of the wine glass is small (efficiency high, bandwidth narrow) the frequency of the note must be exact.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
6K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
981
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K