The amplitude of sound waves from two nearby speakers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interference of sound waves from two speakers emitting in phase with a wavelength of 2m. At point P, the sound waves experience destructive interference due to a path length difference of 1m, while at point Q, they undergo constructive interference as both waves travel 4m. This leads to the conclusion that the amplitude at point P (Ap) is less than that at point Q (Aq), confirming the answer is Ap < Aq. The concept of waves being "in phase" means they have the same frequency and phase angle, but their spatial arrangement can still lead to varying interference patterns. Ultimately, the geometry of wave propagation in three dimensions results in areas of both constructive and destructive interference, depending on the relative positions of the waves.
anhhuyalex
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In the figure below, two speakers S1 and S2 emit sound waves of wavelength 2m, in phase with each other.

20140321_114004.jpg


Let Ap be the amplitude of the resulting wave at point P, and Aq be he amplitude of the resultant wave at point Q. How does Ap compare to Aq?

a. Ap<Aq
b. Ap=Aq
c. Ap>Aq
d. Ap<0, Aq>0
e. Ap and Aq vary with time, so no comparison can be made

Homework Equations


Pythagorean Theorem

The Attempt at a Solution


My guess is that since amplitude varies with time, there would be times when Ap>Aq and vice versa, so the answer would be E. However, my textbook says that the answer is A because at Q sound waves from both speakers traveled 4m, so there would be constructive interference, but at point P sound waves from S1 traveled 4m whereas sound waves from S2 traveled 5m by the Pythagorean theorem, so there is destructive interference. Can you explain to me why there would be destructive interference at all in two waves that were said to be "in phase with each other?" Specifically, can you explain what that phrase and the phrase "out of phase" mean when we're talking about waves?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A wave that is out of phase with another wave is essentially one that has been shifted over. Recall the equation for a wave in two dimensions as a function of time t:

A*sin(ωt + ø)

where ø is the phase. Now if two waves with the same frequency ω both also have ø=0 then the waves are said to be in phase with one another. The amplitude A can still be the same or different.

However, in 3 dimensions the wave looks like a series of concentric circles when viewed from the top. This means any two waves that are overlapping even if they are in phase will always have areas of interference. In some areas the crest meets the crest and in other areas the trough meets the trough. In both cases the interference is said to be constructive or additive.

Where the crest of one wave meets the trough of another wave, however, the waves will cancel each other out and said to be deconstructive or subtractive.

The wiki entry here has some good illustrations of what this looks like:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interference_(wave_propagation )

Another way to think about the mathematics is that using the geometry of 3 dimensions means the waves are effectively shifted by an amount 2∏x/λ:

A*sin(ωt + ø + 2∏x/λ) = A*sin(ωt + 2∏x/λ) for ø=0

where λ is the wave length of the wave and x is the relative position along the wave in a given dimension. So in that sense they could be considered out of phase with one another at some values of x and in phase with one another for other values of x.

So in this case x =4m for the first wave and x =5m for the second wave which is a difference of λ/2 or half a wave length. So they are effectively 90 degrees out of phase at this point.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top