- #1
Not A Physicist
- 3
- 0
I was wondering why the arrow of time can't be defined by the direction in which the forces hold their observed values. It seems to me that if the arrow were to be reversed this would necessitate a reversal of the forces' ability to attract or repel. For example: wouldn't gravity have to start repelling matter? If this is so, shouldn't this be a candidate in the debate over how to define the arrow of time?