The bumpers on a car decrease MPG

  • Thread starter Thread starter Low-Q
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car decrease
AI Thread Summary
Bumpers and shock absorbers play a significant role in a car's performance by applying friction to the suspension, which can lead to energy loss and decreased fuel efficiency. The discussion highlights that regenerative shock absorbers can potentially harvest energy while driving, offering a fuel efficiency increase of 1-4% for conventional vehicles and up to 8% for hybrids. This energy harvesting could mitigate losses by utilizing energy that would otherwise be wasted. The impact of bumpers on MPG is linked to their interaction with suspension systems and road conditions. Overall, optimizing these components could enhance vehicle efficiency and performance.
Low-Q
Gold Member
Messages
283
Reaction score
9
Hi,

I have thought about how the bumpers affects the performance of the available power in a car engine. The bumper applies friction to the suspension so the car doesn't jump off a bumpy road. However, that friction will be a sort of energy loss. The questions is: How much energy loss is it at a given car weight and suspension travel pr. time? By how much will that decrease MPG?

Vidar
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh you mean the shock absorbers...

http://blogs.discovery.com/files/energy-harvesting-shock-absorber-june-2011.pdf

Energy Harvesting Shock Absorbers

snip

We estimated that for a middle-size vehicle, 100W, 400W, and 1600W of average power is available for harvesting from the regenerative shock absorbers while driving on Class B (good), C (average), and D (poor) highways at 60 mph.

snip

This represents a potential of 1-4% fuel efficiency increase in conventional cars and up to 8% for hybrid vehicle.
 
I think they absorb energy which would be lost anyway - just in other parts of the car. They can even reduce losses, if they keep the whole car from bumping around.
If that energy can be extracted: Even better.
 
CWatters said:
Oh you mean the shock absorbers...

http://blogs.discovery.com/files/energy-harvesting-shock-absorber-june-2011.pdf
Yes that's correct :-) I used google translate from Norwegian...
Well, thanks for the link :-)

Vidar
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top