The celebrated Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometric effect

  • Thread starter Thread starter contempquant
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the expectation value of the product of number operators for photons after a beam splitter in the context of the Hong-Ou-Mandel (HOM) effect. The expectation value is found to be zero, which is confirmed as correct, but the reasoning behind this result is unclear to the participants. There is confusion regarding the behavior of photons after the beam splitter, with one participant suggesting that the photons merge into a single photon with double intensity, leading to a 50-50 detection probability at two detectors. The expectation value is questioned in terms of whether it reflects the average intensity at one detector or considers the combined effects of both detectors. The discussion highlights the complexities of interpreting results in quantum optics and the implications of the HOM effect on photon detection.
contempquant
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Determine the expectation values of the product of the number operators

\left\langle{N_{a_{1}}}{N_{b_{1}}}\right\rangle


Explain your result.

Homework Equations



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hong-Ou-Mandel_effect


The Attempt at a Solution



I've got the expectation value as zero, and I've been told that is correct but i can't explain how. The N_a and N_b refer to the two photons or modes after the beam splitter (i think)(mode zero would be before the beam splitter) so i don't know why they seem to disappear after the beam splitter and why the expectation value (is this the average value of the intensity at one of the detectors?) is zero. I would have expected it to be either:

1 - because of the HOM effect the two input photons will merge into one photon with double intensity and since there are two detectors, and the odds of being detected at either is 50-50, the average value at either is half of 2 = 1.

Or

2 - This is if the expectation value only takes into account one of the detectors when the doubled intensity photon is detected..maybe?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is the maple file i have used if anyone wants to look...
 

Attachments

Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...

Similar threads

Back
Top