MHB The Chain Rule for Multivariable Vector-Valued Functions .... ....

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Tom M Apostol's book "Mathematical Analysis" (Second Edition) ...I am focused on Chapter 12: Multivariable Differential Calculus ... and in particular on Section 12.9: The Chain Rule ... ...I need help in order to fully understand Theorem 12.7, Section 12.9 ...Theorem 12.7 (including its proof) reads as follows:
View attachment 8523
View attachment 8524
In the proof of Theorem 12.7 we read the following:

" ... ... Using (14) in (15) we find$$f(b+v) - f(b) = f'(b) [ g'(a) (y) ] + f'(b) [ \| y \| E_a(y) ] + \|v \| E_b(v) $$$$= f'(b) [ g'(a) (y) ] + \| y \| E(y)$$ ... ... ... (16)Where $$E(0) = 0$$ and $$E(y) = f'(b) [ E_a(y) ] + \frac{ \| v \| }{ \| y \| } E_b (v) \ \ \ \ \text{ if } y\neq 0$$ ... ... ... (17)... ... ... "

My questions are as follows:Question 1

Can someone show how Equation (16) follows ... that is ...

... how exactly does $$f(b+v) - f(b) = f'(b) [ g'(a) (y) ] + \| y \| E(y)$$

follow from

$$f(b+v) - f(b) = f'(b) [ g'(a) (y) ] + f'(b) [ \| y \| E_a(y) ] + \|v \| E_b(v)$$?

Question 2

What is $$E(0)$$ ... I know what $$E_a$$ and $$E_b$$ are ... but what is $$E$$?

Similarly ... what is $$E(y)$$ in (16) and in (17) ... shouldn't it be $$E_a(y)$$ ... ?

Further ... why (formally and rigorously) does $$E(0) = 0$$
Question 3

Can someone please demonstrate how/why

$$E(y) = f'(b) [ E_a(y) ] + \frac{ \| v \| }{ \| y \| } E_b (v)$$
Help will be appreciated ...

Peter

=========================================================================================

It may help MHB readers of the above post to have access to Apostol's section on the Total Derivative ... so I am providing the same ... as follows:
View attachment 8525
View attachment 8526
Hope that helps ...

Peter
 

Attachments

  • Apostol - 1 - Theorem 12.7 - Chain Rule - PART 1 ... .png
    Apostol - 1 - Theorem 12.7 - Chain Rule - PART 1 ... .png
    24.4 KB · Views: 117
  • Apostol - 2 - Theorem 12.7 - Chain Rule - PART 2 ...  ... .png
    Apostol - 2 - Theorem 12.7 - Chain Rule - PART 2 ... ... .png
    22.5 KB · Views: 116
  • Apostol - 1 - Section 12.4 - PART 1 ... .png
    Apostol - 1 - Section 12.4 - PART 1 ... .png
    32.4 KB · Views: 104
  • Apostol - 2 - Section 12.4 - PART 2 ... .png
    Apostol - 2 - Section 12.4 - PART 2 ... .png
    40.7 KB · Views: 113
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
In the proof of Theorem 12.7 we read the following:

" ... ... Using (14) in (15) we find$$f(b+v) - f(b) = f'(b) [ g'(a) (y) ] + f'(b) [ \| y \| E_a(y) ] + \|v \| E_b(v) $$$$= f'(b) [ g'(a) (y) ] + \| y \| E(y)$$ ... ... ... (16)Where $$E(0) = 0$$ and $$E(y) = f'(b) [ E_a(y) ] + \frac{ \| v \| }{ \| y \| } E_b (v) \ \ \ \ \text{ if } y\neq 0$$ ... ... ... (17)... ... ... "

My questions are as follows:Question 1

Can someone show how Equation (16) follows ... that is ...

... how exactly does $$f(b+v) - f(b) = f'(b) [ g'(a) (y) ] + \| y \| E(y)$$

follow from

$$f(b+v) - f(b) = f'(b) [ g'(a) (y) ] + f'(b) [ \| y \| E_a(y) ] + \|v \| E_b(v)$$?

Question 2

What is $$E(0)$$ ... I know what $$E_a$$ and $$E_b$$ are ... but what is $$E$$?

Similarly ... what is $$E(y)$$ in (16) and in (17) ... shouldn't it be $$E_a(y)$$ ... ?

Further ... why (formally and rigorously) does $$E(0) = 0$$
Question 3

Can someone please demonstrate how/why

$$E(y) = f'(b) [ E_a(y) ] + \frac{ \| v \| }{ \| y \| } E_b (v)$$
The answer to all three of those questions is that the equations in (17) are meant to be the definition of $E(y)$. In other words, if you define \[E(y) = \begin{cases}0&\text{if }y=0,\\ f'(b) [ E_a(y) ] + \frac{ \| v \| }{ \| y \| } E_b (v)&\text{if }y\ne0,\end{cases}\] then the second line of (16) follows immediately from the first line.
 
Opalg said:
The answer to all three of those questions is that the equations in (17) are meant to be the definition of $E(y)$. In other words, if you define \[E(y) = \begin{cases}0&\text{if }y=0,\\ f'(b) [ E_a(y) ] + \frac{ \| v \| }{ \| y \| } E_b (v)&\text{if }y\ne0,\end{cases}\] then the second line of (16) follows immediately from the first line.
Thanks Opalg ...

Indeed ... you are right, of course!

Should have seen that ...

Peter
 
Back
Top