What Color Does Pure Water Actually Emit?

AI Thread Summary
Pure water is generally considered colorless because it does not significantly absorb visible light; instead, it reflects light from its surface and any suspended particles. When light enters water, it primarily passes through without altering its frequency, meaning the color perceived is largely dependent on the light source and surrounding environment. In deep, clean water, the appearance can be darker due to minimal reflection and absorption. The discussion emphasizes that the color seen in a glass of water is influenced by reflection rather than the water molecules themselves. Ultimately, the wavelengths that reach our eyes are those of the incident light, unaffected by the water's transparency.
Kolahal Bhattacharya
Messages
133
Reaction score
1
I cannot understand what is the colour of water.I was reading an Optics book by Hecht,& suppose that we see coluured bodies due to Dissipative absorption.That is taking up of incident photon,converting a part into thermal energy,and releasing the rest energy as another photon.But, ordinarily we say water colourless.What wavelength is actually emittted?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kolahal Bhattacharya said:
I cannot understand what is the colour of water.I was reading an Optics book by Hecht,& suppose that we see coluured bodies due to Dissipative absorption.That is taking up of incident photon,converting a part into thermal energy,and releasing the rest energy as another photon.But, ordinarily we say water colourless.What wavelength is actually emittted?
Water will reflect light at the surface and from suspended matter within the water. I would think that only a very small portion of the light that passes through the surface of a deep body of water that has no suspended solids will be reflected. So the cleaner and deeper the water, the darker it will look.

AM
 
Last edited by a moderator:
re colour of water

Sir,I did not understand what you want to say.I think it will be helpful if you provide with the mechanism in which any (possible) wavelength reaches our eyes.
Thank you.
 
Kolahal Bhattacharya said:
Sir,I did not understand what you want to say.I think it will be helpful if you provide with the mechanism in which any (possible) wavelength reaches our eyes.
Thank you.
The mechanism by which light incident upon a body of water will reach our eyes is reflection.

AM
 
Your logic is understood.Possibly, you have changed something:water will reflect 'light'...
Well,that's fine.But, when you take a glass of drinking water, just look at it, and what colour do you find?It's my question.
If you like, I wish to know the colour of stainless steel,or...
i.e. ordinarily which are said to be colourless.Reflection of course is the mechanism to make us see those objects...but I want to know the wavelength involved.
Please note this
 
Kolahal Bhattacharya said:
Your logic is understood.Possibly, you have changed something:water will reflect 'light'...
Well,that's fine.But, when you take a glass of drinking water, just look at it, and what colour do you find?It's my question.
If you like, I wish to know the colour of stainless steel,or...
i.e. ordinarily which are said to be colourless.Reflection of course is the mechanism to make us see those objects...but I want to know the wavelength involved.
Please note this
If water has no particles suspended in it, it is transparent: light passes through it. Light does not reflect off the water molecules. The light that reaches the eye from the water is either reflecting off the surfaces or bottom or sides of the container or it is passing through the water. It is not reflecting off the water molecules. The frequency of the light coming through the water to your eye is not materially affected by passing through pure water. So the frequency is whatever the frequency of the light source is. (Lower frequency em radiation such as microwave - radar is a different matter).

AM
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top