The Combination Of Philosophy And Quantum Physics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between Panpsychism and quantum physics, exploring whether Panpsychism can be reconciled with quantum principles and what, if any, quantum physics concepts might contradict it. The conversation is intended to be exploratory and philosophical in nature.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Debate/contested, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if there is any evidence that Panpsychism may be relevant in the quantum realm.
  • Another participant asserts that there is no evidence for Panpsychism in quantum physics but acknowledges the difficulty in defining what could be considered evidence for it.
  • A further participant expresses a desire for examples of evidence supporting Panpsychism, indicating a lack of clarity on the topic.
  • One participant states that discussing which quantum principles might violate Panpsychism is outside the scope of the forum, emphasizing the distinction between philosophy and physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the relationship between Panpsychism and quantum physics, with some expressing skepticism about evidence while others seek clarification and examples. The discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in defining evidence for philosophical concepts within a scientific framework and the challenges of integrating philosophical ideologies with physical theories.

Chris Nimmons
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Does Panpsynchism hold up to the test of quantum physics?
Is there any evidence that Panpsychism may hold its own in the quantum world? What quantum physics principals violate the ideology of Panpsychism? This is meant to be fun. I am curious what other people think.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Chris Nimmons said:
Is there any evidence that Panpsychism may hold its own in the quantum world?
No.
But then again, it’s hard to imagine anything that could be interpreted as evidence... maybe if you could suggest the sorts of things that you might consider evidence in support of panpsychism?
 
I was hoping that would be decided by the reader. Your question is a great question. I don't have an example. I am looking for examples. You don't know what you don't know. I was hoping someone smarter than I am would be able to think of some.
 
Chris Nimmons said:
What quantum physics principals violate the ideology of Panpsychism?

Such a question is out of scope for this forum. Panpsychism is philosophy, not physics.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Chris Nimmons

Similar threads

Graduate Universal quantum physics
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
Undergrad Many-Worlds and Testable Claims
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Undergrad The Born rule -- 100 years ago and today
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Undergrad Measure of existence? (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Graduate Quantum mechanics, many worlds, and its implications -- I have questions
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
Undergrad A Bold New Take on Quantum Theory
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
Undergrad Quantum mechanics via quantum tomography
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
8K
Graduate Game theory, quantum physics and the Bell inequality (paper)
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Undergrad About quantum interference: space and time
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics
  • · Replies 116 ·
4
Replies
116
Views
7K