The commercial toy, Levitron, can achieve stable magnetic levitation

AI Thread Summary
The Levitron toy achieves stable magnetic levitation through gyroscopic stabilization and axis precession, primarily using a vertical spinning axis. The discussion raises the question of whether stable levitation can be achieved with a horizontal spinning axis, referencing Earnshaw's Theorem. It concludes that a horizontally rotating configuration would not allow for stable levitation, as the alternating magnetic poles would cancel out the forces of attraction and repulsion. A generalization is proposed that any magnetic configuration would struggle to achieve stable levitation on a horizontal axis due to the need for a constant vertical force. A theoretical scenario is mentioned where synchronized rotation of both the levitator and base could potentially work, although it would be complex to implement.
Harmony
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
The commercial toy, Levitron, can achieve stable magnetic levitation due to gyroscopic stabilization and axis precesion. The Levitron toy sold in market has a vertical spinning axis, and so far I have not found a variation with horizontal axis.

Is it allowed in Earnshaw's theorem, for a magnetic system to have stable levitation, just by rotation alone, in a horizontal spinning axis?

Thanks in advanced.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Not familiar with Earnshaw's Theorem (will look it up later), but a horizontally rotating levitron would have its positive and negative polls alternately pointing toward the magnet beneath. This would not levitate, asthe equall times of being attracted and repelled by the base would cancel out, and gravity would assert itself.
 


True, the magnetic configuration of Levitron doesn't allow it to rotate on horizontal axis. I did try other magnetic configuration but it doesn't work out as well.

However, can we generalize, that for ANY magnetic configuration, the system wouldn't be able to levitate stably and rotating on horizontal axis?
 


I believe it is a fair generalization. The nature of magnetic levitation requires a vertical force that holds constant. That would seem to dictate the need for both the base and the levitating object to remain vertically stable. I, at least, can think of no way around that (although my imagination is admittedly quite limited).
 


OK, a few minutes of thinking did yield a tantalizing possibility. If both the levitator and the base were revoling at the same rate, so that like poles always faced one another, that might work. Ity would be a nightmare to try to impliment, though.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top