The concept of work and types of energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the relationship between work, energy, and distance, particularly in the context of a rocket's propulsion. It explains that a rocket generates the same impulse regardless of its initial velocity, leading to different kinetic energy gains based on starting conditions. The derivation provided demonstrates that work (W) is defined as the force (F) multiplied by distance (d), linking it to changes in kinetic and potential energy. The conversation emphasizes that understanding these principles is essential for grasping why distance is a critical factor in work calculations. Overall, the discussion highlights the complexities of energy transformation in physical systems.
evokanevo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The concept of "work" and types of energy

I have read the other posts regarding the concept of work and still don't understand why distance has anything to do with it. Anyway, I thought that maybe an explanation of the following might help:

Suppose you have a 1kg space-ship in an empty universe, with zero velocity in some frame of reference. Then it consumes its rocket, which is able to push with 1 Newton force for 1 second**. The ship is now going 1meter / second and has a total energy of 1/2*mv^2 = 0.5 Joules kinetic energy.

Now suppose the same scenario, but the ship initially has a 1 meter / second velocity. The final velocity is 2 meters / second = 1/2*mv^2 = 2 Joules.

So in the first case, the transition of chemical energy to kinetic energy results in a gain of 0.5 Joules for the ship, whereas in the second case, a gain of 1.5 Joules occurs.

**Is it safe to say that a rocket can provide the same impulse, regardless of starting velocity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You are correct. The same rocket will provide the same impulse.

Here's a simple derivation from basic kinematics that should help convince you that W = Fd. It's not a perfect derivation, because I won't factor in any possible potential energy, but here it goes:

d = \frac{v_2^2-v_1^2}{2a}

therefore,

\Delta v^2 = 2ad
\frac{1}{2}\Delta v^2 = ad

multiplying both sides by mass:
\frac{1}{2}m\Delta v^2 = mad

F = ma, and (1/2)mΔv2 = ΔE, so:

\Delta E = Fd

and ΔE is defined as the Work.

If you look at equations for, say, graviational potential, you'll very easily see that the change in potential energy is the work:

ΔU = mgh is the same as saying ΔE = W = mad = Fd where g→a, and h→x. This being the case where only the potential changes, and not the kinetic. This should convince you as to why distance is necessary in work calculations.
 
Last edited:


Your model is too simplistic. The rocket moves by expelling hot gas at a certain velocity w so that the momentum of the gas expelled equals the change of momentum of the spaceship and the kinetic energy of the gas plus the kinetic energy of the spaceship equals the energy stored in the fuel burned.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top