B The deduction of Schrodinger equation, I'm stuck

Joao
Messages
80
Reaction score
8
Hi everyone! Please, I'm trying to understand the Schrodinger equation, and I've understood it this far, which which is a miracle, hehehe:
(Laplacian)(psi) plus ((2phi)/h)^2.2m (E-V)(psi)

I know that hbar = h/(2phi)

But how that turns into

(Laplacian)(psi)+2m/(hbar)^2.(E-V)(psi)

My math isn't good enough... =( can someone please point me how it happened? =)

Thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Or, in other words, how this:
∇^2Ψ+{[2π/h]^2}.2m(E-V)ψ

Assuming

ħ=h/2π

Becomes

∇^2ψ+{2m/ħ^2}(E-V)Ψ

Sorry for the bad English! =)

Thanks!
 
Joao said:
I'm trying to understand the Schrodinger equation

It might help if you would give a reference for where you are getting this from. I'm not sure what you are writing down is a correct expression for the Schrodinger Equation.

Also, please use the PF LaTeX feature, it makes your equations much easier to read. See here for help:

https://www.physicsforums.com/help/latexhelp/
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Joao
PeterDonis said:
It might help if you would give a reference for where you are getting this from. I'm not sure what you are writing down is a correct expression for the Schrodinger Equation.

Also, please use the PF LaTeX feature, it makes your equations much easier to read. See here for help:

https://www.physicsforums.com/help/latexhelp/

Thanks a lot! Sorry for the ugly equations!

I'm based on this YouTube video:



So, I'm starting with the Helmholtz equation:

$$∇^2Ψ+(\frac {2π} {υ})^2Ψ$$

And my goal is to the time independent Schrodinger equation

## - \frac {ħ^2} {2m} ∇^2 Ψ +VΨ = EΨ ##

Miraculously, I 've kind of understood until here:

##∇^2 + (\frac {2π} {h})^2 . 2m (E-V)Ψ ##

And I know that

## ħ= \frac {h} {2π} ##

But I don't understand how that turned into this:

## ∇^2Ψ + \frac {2m} {ħ^2} (E-V)Ψ ##

Please... Can someone please tell me what happened? I don't understand it... =(

Thanks and sorry again for my confusion on the first and second posts!
 
You must be missing something very very trivial, so trivial that it is very difficult to say what it is.
 
  • Like
Likes Joao
Thanks everyone! I just woke and now I understood!

## ħ = \frac {h} {2π} ##
That is the same as h = ħ2π

Just substitute h for ħ2π in the first equation, cancel 2π, ^2 and multiply the 1 with 2m...

Sorry to bother. Thanks all, funny how a night of sleep changes one's perspective.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier and vanhees71
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top