Hi.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I have the following question:

I am a student and my teacher defined therandom sampleas following:

Def:A simple and repeated random sample of size n from the population (omega,K)

for the characteristic Xmega->R is a random vector

V=(X_1,X_2,...,X_n) defined on (omega)^n and with values in R^n as follows:

for O_n=(o_1,o_2,...,o_n) in omega^n we define X_i(O_n)=X(o_i)

Then he proves that X_1,...,X_n are stochastic independent and have the same repartition as the characteristic for study,X,and he calls them sample random variables

Things are well till now.

Then he defines a new "sample random variable", called "the sample mean" like this:

m(X,O_n)mega^n ->R

m(X,O_n)=[X_1(O_n)+X_2(O_n)+...+X_n(O_n)]/n.

Good.

Now(and here is the problem) he states that the

sequence of random variables m(X,O_n) for n converges almost sure to M(X) the mean of the characteristic.

What i don't understand is the follwing:

how is this a sequence of random variables?

I mean,when we define a sequence of functions don't they have the same domain?

Here, m(X,O_n) has the domain omega^n, which changes with n!!!!!!

Isn't this a problem??

I looked on the definition of almost sure convergence and it says that all X_n are defined on the same set!!!

And another problem is the proof of this teacher for the almost sure convergence of the sequence m(X;O_n)-

he applies the law of large numbers to the sequence X_n!!!!

But how the hell can he do that,since

in

m(X;O_n) we have X_1,....,X_n defined on omega^n and in

m(X;O_n+1) the random variables X_1,...X_n,X_n+1 are defined on omega^(n+1)

so X_1,...,X_n in m(X;O_n+1) are different from X_1,...,X_n in omega^n.

Is this teacher right????

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# The definition of random sample mean and convergence

Loading...

Similar Threads for definition random sample | Date |
---|---|

B Is there a definition of randomness? | Dec 14, 2017 |

I Equivalent definitions of random variable | Jan 16, 2017 |

Definition issue frequency domain - Random Signal Processing | Apr 9, 2013 |

Definition of Random Variable (from Durrett) | Jun 6, 2011 |

Definite integral over random interval | Oct 7, 2009 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**