The difference in mechanical energy of a satellite

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the difference in mechanical energy for a satellite transitioning from a starting point to a heliostationary orbit. The user successfully solved parts (a) and (b) of the homework but struggles with part (c), specifically whether to include kinetic energy in their calculations. They initially calculated the potential energy difference but later realized they also needed to account for kinetic energy, which they derived using the orbital period and radius. After recalculating, they found their results were close to the provided answer, suggesting that minor discrepancies could be due to rounding errors. The conversation highlights the importance of considering both potential and kinetic energy in mechanical energy calculations for orbital mechanics.
Kare Skinnebach
Messages
3
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


This is from an exam for my current course in "Mechanics 2", from a couple of years ago, which means that the correct answers are given for checking results, but without further explanations. I'm confused about part (c) where my results do not correspond with the given answer, and I don't understand why.

My assignment is in Danish, so it's not verbatim, but I translated it as well as I could:
"To study an area with high solar activity at the Sun's equator, a satellite is sent into a heliostationary orbit (a satellite in a heliostationary orbit stays above the same point on the Sun's equator.

a) Find the distance from the center of the Sun at which the satellite will need to orbit, given that the Sun at the equator makes one rotation around its own axis in 27 days, 6 hours and 36 minutes. [solved]

b) The satellite starts at a point on the imaginary line going from the center of the Earth to the center of the Sun, where the gravity from the Sun and the gravity from the Earth cancel out. Calculate the distance from the center of the Earth to this point. [solved]

c) Determine the difference in the mechanical energy from the starting point to the heliostationary orbit for a satellite with a mass of 120 kg, given that the initial velocity at the starting point is ##v_i=0## m/s." [having trouble with this one]

We are given the following information:
Gravitational constant ##G=6.67*10^{-11}## Nm^2/kg^2
Mass of the Sun ##M_s=1.99*10^{30}## kg
Mass of the Earth ##M_e=5.98*10^{24}## kg
Radius of the Earth's orbit ##r_e=1.50*10^{11}## m

Homework Equations


1) Force of gravity ##F_g=\frac{Gm_1m_2}{r^2}##
2) Potential energy due to gravity ##U=-\frac{Gm_1m_2}{r}##
3) Period in circular orbit ##2 \pi r*\sqrt{\frac{r}{G*m_e}}##

The Attempt at a Solution


To solve part (a), I used equation (3) above and set the period for the orbit equal to the rotation time of the Sun (converted to seconds), solve for ##r##. ##r=2.65*10^{10}## m

(b) I made use of the fact that the force of gravity exerted on the satellite by the Sun and by the Earth would be equal at this starting position: ##F_{gs}=F_{ge}##
I then used equation (2) above: ##\frac{GM_e}{r_s}=\frac{GM_s}{(r_e-r_s)^2} \Rightarrow r_s=2.60*10^8## m

(c) I figured that to calculate this I would need to find the difference in the sum of potential energy between the starting point and the heliostationary orbit. Is this wrong? Do I need to include the kinetic energy as well, and if so, how do I find it?
What I got was ##\Delta E=(U_{sun,final}+U_{earth,final})-(U_{sun,initial}+U_{earth,inital})## (total final potential energy minus total initial potential energy). This gives me ##\Delta E = 4.938*10^{11}## J, but the answer given is ##1.9345*10^{11}## J.

Help would be greatly appreciated. :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
As your solution to a), you have ##r = 2.65 \times 10^5m##

Isn't that inside the sun?
 
(b) is odd as well. While it might be the right answer to the problem statement, the problem ignores that Earth is rotating around the sun. The moon has a larger distance to Earth, and it still orbits Earth.
Kare Skinnebach said:
(c) I figured that to calculate this I would need to find the difference in the sum of potential energy between the starting point and the heliostationary orbit. Is this wrong? Do I need to include the kinetic energy as well, and if so, how do I find it?
You need the kinetic energy as well. You know the period and the radius of the satellite in the final orbit, how can you get the kinetic energy?A bonus question to get some sense of scale: How many tons of explosives (e. g. TNT) do you need to get this energy? Compare this to the 120 kg of the space probe.
 
PeroK said:
As your solution to a), you have ##r = 2.65 \times 10^5m##

Isn't that inside the sun?
Whoops, that was a typo. It's supposed to be ##2.65*10^{10}##. And that's the distance from the center of the Earth.
 
mfb said:
(b) is odd as well. While it might be the right answer to the problem statement, the problem ignores that Earth is rotating around the sun. The moon has a larger distance to Earth, and it still orbits Earth.You need the kinetic energy as well. You know the period and the radius of the satellite in the final orbit, how can you get the kinetic energy?A bonus question to get some sense of scale: How many tons of explosives (e. g. TNT) do you need to get this energy? Compare this to the 120 kg of the space probe.
Yeah that is kind of weird.
For the kinetic energy, I think I just found the right formula: I found v from ##T=\frac{2\pi r}{v}##, then used ##K=\frac{1}{2} mv^2## to find kinetic energy and just added that to the potential energy difference, is that right?
I get ##K=1.9364*10^{11}##, but the correct answer is ##1.9345*10^{11}##, but that could just be a rounding error or something.
By my calculations you would need ##46.28## tons of TNT, which is quite a lot compared to the weight of the satellite, hadn't really thought much about that number. Thank you for that, haha! :)
 
The small difference should be a rounding error, right.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top