The energy dispersion relation for sc, bcc and fcc?

Rrrenata
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need to calculate the energy dispersion relation in the tight binding for simple cubic, base centered cubic and face centered cubic crystals. There are no values given, they just need the result depending on the lattice constant a.

Homework Equations


E (k) = alpha + beta * S * e^[ik(R-R')],
for alpha = the Coulomb integral, beta = the exchange integral, and S = the sum over the nearest neighbors of atoms at position R.

The Attempt at a Solution


I can see how S depends on the crystal structure, but is that it? Should I just keep the formula and only change the number of the nearest atoms for the three different structures? Also, is it relevant where you fix R? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are R' the positions of those nearest neighbors?
I would expect that this exponential gets summed over, not a sum multiplied by an exponential.
 
mfb said:
Are R' the positions of those nearest neighbors?
I would expect that this exponential gets summed over, not a sum multiplied by an exponential.
Oh my God, yes, it is the sum over the exponential and i am stupid.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top