The equation of a normal plane to a curve - confusion

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the equations for the normal plane and tangent line to a curve and surface in three-dimensional space. Participants explore the mathematical representations and concepts related to tangent and normal planes, particularly in the context of differentiating functions of multiple variables.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the normal plane to a curve can be represented by various equations derived from the tangent plane equation.
  • Others argue that the initial premise of defining a curve as f(x,y,z) is incorrect, suggesting that a curve should be defined parametrically, such as x = f(t), y = g(t), z = h(t).
  • A participant questions the differentiation of a point, suggesting that the correct term should be the partial derivative of the function f, not d.
  • One participant clarifies that a smooth surface has a tangent plane at any point, and thus, there are infinitely many tangent lines within that plane.
  • Another participant notes that in three dimensions, a smooth curve has a single tangent line and a single normal plane, leading to multiple normal lines at a point.
  • There is a discussion about the differences in geometry between two and three dimensions, emphasizing that the concepts of tangent and normal lines and planes differ significantly.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the definitions and representations of curves and surfaces, with some asserting that the original question was misworded. The discussion remains unresolved as participants explore different interpretations and mathematical representations.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the ambiguity in defining curves versus surfaces and the implications of differentiating functions of multiple variables. The discussion reflects varying levels of understanding regarding the geometry of curves and surfaces in three dimensions.

Ian_Brooks
Messages
127
Reaction score
0
Not a homework question

say we have a curve f(x,y,z)

and the tangent plane to the curve at a point (xo,yo,zo) is given by

[tex]\frac{{\partial d}}{{\partial x}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(x-xo) + [tex]\frac{{\partial d}}{{\partial y}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(y-yo) + [tex]\frac{{\partial d}}{{\partial z}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(z-zo) = 0

then would the normal plane to the curve be either of the following?

[tex]\frac{{\partial d}}{{\partial y}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(x-xo) - [tex]\frac{{\partial d}}{{\partial z}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(y-yo) - [tex]\frac{{\partial d}}{{\partial x}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(z-zo) = 0

[tex]\frac{{\partial d}}{{\partial y}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(x-xo) - [tex]\frac{{\partial d}}{{\partial x}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(y-yo) - [tex]\frac{{\partial d}}{{\partial y}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(z-zo) = 0

[tex]\frac{{\partial d}}{{\partial z}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(x-xo) - [tex]\frac{{\partial d}}{{\partial x}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(y-yo) - [tex]\frac{{\partial d}}{{\partial y}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(z-zo) = 0

[tex]\frac{{\partial d}}{{\partial z}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(x-xo) - [tex]\frac{{\partial d}}{{\partial y}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(y-yo) - [tex]\frac{{\partial d}}{{\partial x}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(z-zo) = 0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ian_Brooks said:
Not a homework question

say we have a curve f(x,y,z)

and the tangent plane to the curve at a point (xo,yo,zo) is given by

[tex]\frac{{\partial d}}{{\partial x}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(x-xo) + [tex]\frac{{\partial d}}{{\partial y}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(y-yo) + [tex]\frac{{\partial d}}{{\partial z}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(z-zo) = 0
then would the normal plane to the curve be either of the following?

[tex]\frac{{\partial d}}{{\partial y}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(x-xo) - [tex]\frac{{\partial d}}{{\partial z}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(y-yo) - [tex]\frac{{\partial d}}{{\partial x}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(z-zo) = 0

[tex]\frac{{\partial d}}{{\partial y}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(x-xo) - [tex]\frac{{\partial d}}{{\partial x}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(y-yo) - [tex]\frac{{\partial d}}{{\partial y}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(z-zo) = 0

[tex]\frac{{\partial d}}{{\partial z}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(x-xo) - [tex]\frac{{\partial d}}{{\partial x}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(y-yo) - [tex]\frac{{\partial d}}{{\partial y}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(z-zo) = 0

[tex]\frac{{\partial d}}{{\partial z}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(x-xo) - [tex]\frac{{\partial d}}{{\partial y}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(y-yo) - [tex]\frac{{\partial d}}{{\partial x}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(z-zo) = 0
I don't know where to start! In the first place, "f(x,y,z)" is NOT a curve. If you mean an equation such as f(x,y,z)= 0 that describes a surface, not a curve.

Second, I don't know what you mean by
[tex]\frac{{\partial d}}{{\partial x}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)
You don't differentiate a point!
My guess would be that you mean
[tex]\frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial x}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)
but then that is the tangent plane to a surface, not to a curve.


If you are given a curve as x= f(t), y= g(t), z= h(t) for some parameter t, then the tangent vector at [itex](x_0, y_0, z_0)[/itex] is [itex]f'(t_0)\vec{i}+ g'(t_0)\vec{j}+ h'(t_0)\vec{k}[/itex] where [itex]x_0= g(t_0)[/itex], etc.

The tangent line to that curve is given by [itex]x= f'(t_0)t+ f(t_0)[/itex], [itex]y= g'(t_0)t+ g(t_0)[/itex], [itex]z= h'(t_0)t+ h(t_0)[/itex]. A curve does not have a "tangent plane"- there are an infinite number of planes tangent to a smooth curve at a given point.

and the normal plane by [itex]f'(t_0)(x- f(t_0))+ g'(t_0)(y- g(t_0))+ h'(t_0)(z- h(t_0))= 0.[/itex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I worded the question wrong

Say we had a function of x, y, z that resulted in a surface in 3 dimensions.

f(x,y,z) = 3x3 -9xy2 + 15x2y + 19

then to find the tangent line at an arbitrary point say (xo,yo,zo)

we use the following equation

[tex]\frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial x}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(x-xo) + [tex]\frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial y}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(y-yo) + [tex]\frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial z}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(z-zo) = 0

which means I find the partial derivatives of f with respect to x,y and z then I substitute the points (xo,yo,zo). I get a scaler value which i multiply with the corresponding form needed to find the equation of a line.then how would we modify the above for to find the equation of the normal line to the curve in 3D? I thought it would have several forms as shown above.

why?
since in 2 dimensions we have
[tex]\frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial x}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(x-xo) + [tex]\frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial y}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(y-yo) = 0

and the normal line is
[tex]\frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial y}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(x-xo) - [tex]\frac{{\partial df}}{{\partial x}}[/tex](xo,yo,zo)(y-yo) = 0

so in 3 dimensions I thought it would be different. Or we can take the tangent line and find the negative reciprocal for one partial derivative at the point selected.
 
Last edited:
Now you are asking for "the" tangent line to a surface at a point? Again, there is no such thing! A smooth surface has a tangent plane at any point. Any line lying in that tangent plane and passing through that point is a tangent line.

Yes, it is "different in three dimension" but more different than you seem to think! The geometry of three dimensions simply isn't the geometry of two dimensions.

In two dimensions, a smooth curve has a single tangent line and a single normal line.

In three dimensions, a smooth curve has a single tangent line and a single normal plane, so an infinite number of normal lines, at a point.

In three dimensions, a smooth surface has a single normal line and a single tangent plane, so an infinite number of tangent line at a point.
 
ahh that makes more sense,

thanks for bearing with me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K