The gravitational force between and around 2 objects

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on simplifying the problem of gravitational force between two identical spaceships. It highlights that the gravitational force cannot be analyzed separately due to the zero force point between the two masses. A suggested approach is to calculate the gravitational effects from one spaceship and then transform and sum the graphs to find the zero point. The importance of using the center of mass as a reference point for solving the problem is emphasized, particularly in dynamics and rotation. This method provides a clearer understanding of the gravitational interactions involved.
robert80
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


These days I am having the exam for physics 1. Could you please give me the idea, howto simplify the following exercise? You have 2 spaceships of the same shape and they are from the same material. You can have circular or eliptic spaceships for instance. Now you must draw the graph how the force is changing on the straight line between the centres of gravity.



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Its surelly not possible to look at them seperatelly and simply sum the graphs as the force in the middle of them becomes 0. And there is no zero point in the centre of the masses too. Is it possible when you calculate the gravity from 1 spaceship and solve the integrals in 1 spaceship and around 1 spaceship is than possible to transform the graph and sum both graphs, that you get zero point then? How you do that? Or is there any other way to simplify this problem? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
by looking the centre of mass, you can seek a solution. for the bodies are same, the centre of mass (as position) remains constant. this state, can become a reference the solving problem (momentum conservation relative to the centre of mass...).
 
Ok thanks, what a brilliant solution. Havent thought of that. But its true that if you take the centre of the mass coordinate system in planty of cases is very good when doing the dynamics for instance... Or rotation. Havent thought of that in this exercise.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top