The ground state of a time-reversal invariant system must has zero momentum?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on whether the ground state of a time-reversal invariant system must have zero momentum. Participants explore the implications of degeneracy in ground states, the role of time-reversal symmetry, and the relationship between momentum and energy eigenstates.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that if the ground state is non-degenerate, it is straightforward to conclude it has zero momentum.
  • Others contend that a degenerate ground state with eigenmomenta p and -p does not imply a state of zero momentum, as measuring momentum would yield values other than zero.
  • One participant asserts that the statement regarding the necessity of zero momentum for the ground state is false, suggesting that spontaneous breaking of time reversal symmetry can lead to a degenerate ground state with non-zero momentum.
  • Examples are provided, such as a ferromagnet at zero temperature, where the ground state can be degenerate with all spins aligned or reversed.
  • A specific Hamiltonian is mentioned that describes rotons in He-4, which has degenerate ground states with non-zero momentum.
  • Concerns are raised about the uncertainty of momentum in energy eigenstates due to the non-commutation of the momentum operator with the Hamiltonian, leading to a spectrum of possible momentum values rather than a unique ground state momentum.
  • Clarifications are sought regarding the context of the term "ground state" and its relation to the Hamiltonian, with references to literature being requested for further understanding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement on whether the ground state must have zero momentum, with multiple competing views on the implications of degeneracy and the nature of momentum in energy eigenstates. The discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the Hamiltonian and the definitions of ground states and momentum, which are not fully explored or resolved in the discussion.

wdlang
Messages
306
Reaction score
0
if the ground state is non-degenearate, this is easily understood

But what if the ground state is non-degenerate?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are arguing that the ground state is degenerate with eigenmomenta p and -p, I would argue this is not a state of zero momenta (even though the expectation value of the momentum operator is 0): if you measure p, you never get 0.
 
Hi wdlang,

The statement that the ground state of a time reversal invariant Hamiltonian must have zero momentum is simply not true.

The ground state may spontaneously break time reversal symmetry. However, if it does, then time reversal symmetry implies the existence of another perfectly good time reversed ground state. Thus the ground state is degenerate in this case.

I can give a simpler example than momentum that may help. Consider a ferromagnet at zero temperature. The ground state has all the spins aligned, but there is an equally good ground state with all spins reversed. The ground state is in fact degenerate.

For the case of momentum, here is a simple example that works. Consider the Hamiltonian H = E0 + (|p| - p0)^2/2m with E0, p0, and m constants . Such a Hamiltonian roughly describes rotons in He-4. The ground states of this hamiltonian have non-zero momentum and are degenerate.

Hope this helps.
 
Physics Monkey said:
Hi wdlang,

The statement that the ground state of a time reversal invariant Hamiltonian must have zero momentum is simply not true.

The ground state may spontaneously break time reversal symmetry. However, if it does, then time reversal symmetry implies the existence of another perfectly good time reversed ground state. Thus the ground state is degenerate in this case.

I can give a simpler example than momentum that may help. Consider a ferromagnet at zero temperature. The ground state has all the spins aligned, but there is an equally good ground state with all spins reversed. The ground state is in fact degenerate.

For the case of momentum, here is a simple example that works. Consider the Hamiltonian H = E0 + (|p| - p0)^2/2m with E0, p0, and m constants . Such a Hamiltonian roughly describes rotons in He-4. The ground states of this hamiltonian have non-zero momentum and are degenerate.

Hope this helps.

thanks a lot!

yes, your example is good
 
When you say "ground state", I assume you mean ground state of the Hamiltonian, i.e. the energy ground state.

Generally speaking, because of the position dependent potential energy term in the Hamiltonian, the momentum operator does not commute with the Hamiltonian. In any energy eigenstate the momentum is uncertain; there is no ground state momentum. Thus, if we measure the momentum in the ground state, there is an entire eigenvalue spectrum of possible results, but there is no unique value .

The Hamiltonian eigenvalue equation is the Schrödinger time independent equation. (time independent??) So, I am confused! Could you please give me a reference where you saw this? Thank you.
 
Are you referring to a time-dependent Hamiltonian?
 
eaglelake said:
When you say "ground state", I assume you mean ground state of the Hamiltonian, i.e. the energy ground state.

Generally speaking, because of the position dependent potential energy term in the Hamiltonian, the momentum operator does not commute with the Hamiltonian. In any energy eigenstate the momentum is uncertain; there is no ground state momentum. Thus, if we measure the momentum in the ground state, there is an entire eigenvalue spectrum of possible results, but there is no unique value .

The Hamiltonian eigenvalue equation is the Schrödinger time independent equation. (time independent??) So, I am confused! Could you please give me a reference where you saw this? Thank you.

i saw this statement in the RMP paper by I. Bloch et al.

RMP 80, 885 (2008)

on page 905, the paragraph under eq. 65.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K