The hermitian conjugate/adjoint -Quantum Physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Calcifur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hermitian Physics
Calcifur
Messages
24
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



The hermitian conjugate of an operator, \hat{F}, written \hat{F}^{\tau} satisfies the condition:

∫∅*(r)\hat{F}^{\tau}ψ(r)dr=(∫ψ*(r)\hat{F}∅(r)dr)*

for any choice of wavefunctions ψ and ∅. Show that:

(\hat{F}+i\hat{G})^{\tau}=\hat{F}^{\tau} -i\hat{G}^{\tau}

(10 marks)
2. The attempt at a solution

I feel like I'm missing something here, either that or the question's stupidly easily and isn't worth ten marks.
As ((A + B)* = A* + B*) and as with all complex conjugates (x+iy)*=(x-iy), it can be applied to the above as it's still just a complex conjugate. I know I'm supposed to use the condition above somehow so without obviously telling me the answer, could someone point me in the right direction for how I'm supposed to SHOW it please.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
did you try using (F+iG) as an operator and then using the
∫∅*(r)Fˆτψ(r)dr=(∫ψ*(r)Fˆ∅(r)dr)* and seperating them while they are in (... )* and then apply
∫∅*(r)Fˆτψ(r)dr=(∫ψ*(r)Fˆ∅(r)dr)* in reverse way ? not sure but that may help.
 
Hmmm. Yes, I can sort of see what you mean. I've tried it but I'm still confused with how the τ's are allowed to be separated. I think it's due to the question being worded in a confusing way. If I knew how operators could be manipulated algebraically then I'd probably get somewhere...I'm assuming they don't function like normal variables?
 
∫∅*(r)(Fˆ+iGˆ)τψ(r)dr=(∫ψ*(r)(Fˆ+iGˆ)∅(r)dr)*
=(∫ψ*(r)(Fˆ)∅(r)dr+i∫ψ*(r)Gˆ(r)∅(r)dr)*
=((∫∅*(r)Fˆτψ(r)dr)*+i(∫∅*(r)Gˆτψ(r)dr)*)*
 
crimsonidol said:
∫∅*(r)(Fˆ+iGˆ)τψ(r)dr=(∫ψ*(r)(Fˆ+iGˆ)∅(r)dr)*
=(∫ψ*(r)(Fˆ)∅(r)dr+i∫ψ*(r)Gˆ(r)∅(r)dr)*
=((∫∅*(r)Fˆτψ(r)dr)*+i(∫∅*(r)Gˆτψ(r)dr)*)*

Brilliant... I understand it now thanks crimsonidol!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top