What is the Equivalent Megapixel Rating of the Human Eye?

  • Thread starter Thread starter memorygap
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Camera Eye Human
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the equivalent megapixel rating of the human eye, with estimates suggesting it could be around 10 to 50 megapixels, depending on comparisons to film negatives. It is noted that the human eye's resolution varies across the visual field, with higher acuity at the fovea due to the density of rods and cones. Research indicates that the adult retina contains approximately 126 million receptors, comprising about 120 million rods and 6 million cones. However, not all receptors are activated simultaneously, as their response varies with lighting conditions. The conversation also touches on the differences between human vision and machine vision, highlighting ongoing interest in developing biological cameras that mimic the eye's processes.
memorygap
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
i was just wondering, what is the equivelent megapixel rating of the human eye? i would expect the back of the eye to be around the size of a 35mm negative commonly rated at around 10mp, it can't be any bigger than a 120 film negative which is rated somewhere around 50mp.
is there any research underway for a biological camera which uses the same processes as the human eye? and if so, how is it underway?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
One thing I can tell you is that the human eye is not the same resolution across your visual field. Acuity is much better at the fovea than at the outer areas. It depends on how densly the neurons in the eye are packed. There is only so much room in there for various rods and cones. I'm not sure how the human eye compares to cameras in terms of resolution. I know that human vision an machine vison in general are very different things.
 
You might be interested in the following figure:
rcdist.gif


about rod and cone density on retina (rods are for aren't color sensitive, but are more sensitive than cones, who ARE color sensitive) on the following website: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/vision/rodcone.html
 
Maybe this site? http://www.wdv.com/Eye/EyeBandwidth/

A Better Approximation: The Eye has 126 Million "Pixels"
According to Dr. John Penn, of the UAMS eye center, the adult retina has 126 million receptors. He points out that not all of these are activated under all lighting conditions, to wit, "as light environment increases in luminance, rod response becomes saturated long before cones are maximally functional."

Washington neuroscience agrees with Dr. Penn. According to this source there are 120 million rods and 6 million cones.
Using the figure of 126 million "pixels" or receptors a display device that met or exceeded the performance of a fixed, staring eye would have 11,225 pixels on an edge.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top