The Hydrogen Atom: An Unique Case of Quantum Numbers

albertsmith
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
Why is the hydrogen the only atom that depends only on principal quantum number n and for all other elements, energies depend on both orbital quantum number and principal quantum number?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
in other atoms there will be electron-electron interactions.
 
Incomplete. The reason is an "extra" conserved quantity, called the Runge-Lenz vector (check wikipedia). It's somehow, the same reason for which orbits close (i.e.: ellipses) under the 1/r^2 potential but they do not in general 1/r^p ones.

Also, if you take into account fine structure effects, there appears an "l" dependence of the energy levels. E.g., if you consider relativistic effects, as in Dirac eq.
 
And that L-dependence will also be around in hydrogen atoms.
 
The hydrogen atom has both spin-orbit coupling (coupling of the electron magnetic moment and the orbital magnetic moment) and coupling to the proton magnetic moment that create both fine structure and hyperfine structure of the electron energy levels. The famous ones are the Lamb shift and the 1420 MHz (21 cm electron-proton spin coupling) line in intergalactic hydrogen.
 
l dependence of hydrogen will also arise due to perturbations in the potential, such as an external electric or magnetic field. You can look up the Zeeman effect and the Stark effect.

SO! Really, only ideal hydrogen atom has only n dependence. Real hydrogen atoms have l and m dependence.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top