THe Laplace random variable has a PDF that is a double exponential

nbalderaz
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
THe Laplace random variable has a PDF that is a double exponential, fT(t)=ae^(-|t|/2) for all values of t and a, a constant to be determined.


A) Find a
(Answer 1/4)

B)Find the expected value of T, given T is greater than or equal to -1.
(Answer 1.31)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nbalderaz said:
THe Laplace random variable has a PDF that is a double exponential, fT(t)=ae^(-|t|/2) for all values of t and a, a constant to be determined.


A) Find a
(Answer 1/4)

The total "cumulative probability" must be 1 and since this pdf is symmetric, we must have \int_0^{\infinity}ae^\frac{-t}{2}dt= 1/2. Do that integration and solve for a.

B)Find the expected value of T, given T is greater than or equal to -1.
(Answer 1.31)

Knowing that "T is greater than or equal to -1" tells us that the distribution must be "normalized" so that the total integral from -1 to infinity must now be 1. Put the value of a you found in (A) in the pdf and integrate it from -1 to infinity (again, using symmetry, that is the same as \frac{1}{2}+ \int_0^1 ae^\frac{-t}{2}dt). Divide the original pdf by that. Using "A" for "a" in that modified pdf, the expected value of T is
A\int_{-1}^{\infinity}te^\frac{-t}{2}dt. You can integrate that using "integration by parts".
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Back
Top