The length of an uncoiled spring

  • Thread starter Thread starter lntz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Length Spring
AI Thread Summary
To find the length of an uncoiled spring, which can be modeled as a helix, one can use the helix formula and calculate the arc length. The parameters include the radius of the helix and the vertical distance between turns. The total length can be determined by integrating the differential of arc length over the specified range of the parameter. For spiral staircases, understanding the height and number of steps helps in calculating the horizontal depth of each step, which varies based on the distance from the central axis. This approach allows for precise design considerations in architecture.
lntz
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

my question is how would I find the length of an uncoiled spring?

I hope that is clear enough, but other ways of explaining what I'm looking for look like this: How would I find the length of a line that made a spring x meters high?

Or how would you know how long a piece of metal must be to manufacture a spring x meters high.

A little background info. I'm studying architecture and have been thinking about spiral stair cases. Knowing the elevation you hope to achieve via the staircase is useful for knowing how high/how many steps are required. But for knowing how "deep" a step must be (ie the horizontal element that you step on), it seems to me that it would be useful to calculate the entire "length" of your staircase.

I have considered thinking about the problem as having a step placed at regular intervals on a circle. So you would have x amount of circles stacked on top of each other, with steps that form a spiral. However i'd really like to know if there's some maths that can help me with my problem.

Thanks in advance for any help you can give! Lntz.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You could try the helix formula and do the arc length of it. Should work.
 
A spring is, as zapz suggested, is a helix. It can be modeled as x= r cos(t), y= r sin(t) [/tex]z= (h/2\pi)t[/tex] where "r" is the radius of the helix and "h" is the vertical distance between two consecutive "turns' of the helix. "t" is the parameter giving each point on the heiix as t varies.

dx/dt= -r sin(t), dy/dt= r cos(t), and dz/dt= h/2\pi.
The "differential of arclength is
\sqrt{(dx/dt)^2+ (dy/dt)^2+ (dz/dt)^2}dt=\sqrt{r^2sin^2(t)+ r^2cos^2(t)+ r^2sin^2(t)+ h^2/4\pi^2}dt= \sqrt{r^2+ h^2/4\pi^2}dt

The total length is the integral of that from whatever t determines the beginning of the helix to whatever t determines the end of the helix. And, since that differential is a constant, it is just the that constant times the difference into two "t"s. In particular, if we take z= 0 as the start and z= H as the end, because z= (h/2\pi)t we have (h/2\pi)t= 0 at one end and (h/2\pi)t= H at the other so that t= 0 and t= 2\pi H/h at the other.

The length of the helix is (2\pi H/h)\sqrt{r^2+ h^2/4\pi^2}dt
 
Since you are asking about the depth of each step, you find an exact description without considering the length of a helix. Using Halls notation, we have the total height of the staircase = H. Presumably, the height of an individual step is standardized, so let's call it s.

If N is the total number of steps then N = H/s.

If you completely neglect the change in height as you go around the staircase, then what happens is that each step takes you a certain angle, A, around the circle. Using Halls' notation, let h be the number of times your staircase wraps around. Then the total angle you go around is 2∏h. Since their are N steps, that means

2∏h = NA.

And N = H/s, so A = 2∏hs/H.

That is the angle of the step. Its horizontal "depth" is equal to the angle times the distance, R, to the central axis of the staircase.

Depth = R* (2∏hs/H)

The value of R changes from the inside to the outside of the step. That is why there is more room for you foot on the outer edge of the spiral than on the inner edge.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top