blue2script
- 44
- 0
Dear all,
I want to calculate the following integral
<br /> \int_{-\infty}^0 dk \frac{k\left(\frac{k^2-m^2}{k}\cos\frac{2(x M - k)c_0}{m y} + m\sin\frac{2(x M - k)c_0}{m y} + \frac{k^2+m^2}{2k}\right)}{\sinh^2\frac{(x M - k)\pi}{2my}((k^2 - m^2)^2 + 4 k^2 m^2 y^2)}<br />
in the limit y\to 1 to examine the small x regime (x > 0, x << 1). However, c_0 is given by
<br /> c_0 = \frac{1}{2}\operatorname{arctanh}y<br />
so it diverges in the limit y\to 1. But then I would state that we may neglect the cosine and sine terms since they oscillate so rapidly that there contribution to the integral vanishes. My professor however, with whom I discussed this matter, says I am not eligible to do that since I want to examine the low-x regime where I get a pole in the limit x\to 0. Than my arguing would not be true.
I told him I would try to give this one a rigourious mathematical treatment. But then 1) I can't see what is wrong with my arguments since I am not examing x = 0 but only small but non-zero x where there is no pole and 2) it looks so obvious to me that I don't really know how to treat this on solid mathematical grounds.
Thats why I would really appreciate a discussion about this integral in the limit y\to 1. Hopefully some of you has some idea how to treat this.
A big thanks in advance!
Blue2script
I want to calculate the following integral
<br /> \int_{-\infty}^0 dk \frac{k\left(\frac{k^2-m^2}{k}\cos\frac{2(x M - k)c_0}{m y} + m\sin\frac{2(x M - k)c_0}{m y} + \frac{k^2+m^2}{2k}\right)}{\sinh^2\frac{(x M - k)\pi}{2my}((k^2 - m^2)^2 + 4 k^2 m^2 y^2)}<br />
in the limit y\to 1 to examine the small x regime (x > 0, x << 1). However, c_0 is given by
<br /> c_0 = \frac{1}{2}\operatorname{arctanh}y<br />
so it diverges in the limit y\to 1. But then I would state that we may neglect the cosine and sine terms since they oscillate so rapidly that there contribution to the integral vanishes. My professor however, with whom I discussed this matter, says I am not eligible to do that since I want to examine the low-x regime where I get a pole in the limit x\to 0. Than my arguing would not be true.
I told him I would try to give this one a rigourious mathematical treatment. But then 1) I can't see what is wrong with my arguments since I am not examing x = 0 but only small but non-zero x where there is no pole and 2) it looks so obvious to me that I don't really know how to treat this on solid mathematical grounds.
Thats why I would really appreciate a discussion about this integral in the limit y\to 1. Hopefully some of you has some idea how to treat this.
A big thanks in advance!
Blue2script