The limit of the product is the product of the limits.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on evaluating the limit of (t * cos(t)) / e^t as t approaches infinity. It is established that the limit approaches 0, as the exponential function grows much faster than the linear term. Participants suggest using the Squeeze Theorem to formalize the argument, noting that both the upper and lower bounds converge to 0. The conversation highlights the importance of separating components of the limit for easier analysis. Overall, the limit can be effectively proven using these mathematical principles.
Spectre5
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
I know that the limit as cos(t) goes to infinity is undefined becuase cosine oscillates between plus and minus one.

Now I have this limit to compute:

Limit of [ (t * cost(t)) / (e^(t)) ] as t goes to infinity

I know that the answer is 0 and I intuitively know why (because exp raises value far quicker than just t)

But, how do I go about proving this...the top is undefined and using LoHospitals rule gets no where becuase a (t * sin(t)) will still be in the numerator.

So how do I go about doing this? Can I just ignore the affects of the cos and just use LoHospitals rule for t/e^t??

Thanks for any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The limit of the product is the product of the limits.
Try separating your limit into things you can work with, and go from there.
 
You could use the formal Delta-Epsilon definition of a limit, but as you said earlier, you can intuitively look at the limit. Sine will oscillate between -1 and 1 forever, but x will continue to grow infinitely large. So the result will be that y-values of the function will get increasingly smaller for both positive and negative numbers. It will jump between very small positive and very small negative numbers, but both numbers are going to 0.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Use this

-\frac{t}{e^{t}}\leq \frac{t\cos t}{e^{t}}\leq +\frac{t}{e^{t}}

and then the "sqeeze theorem".

Daniel.
 
thanks for the help everyone

dextercioby: ahhhh forgot about the sqeeze therom :) thanks
 
That is "squeeze" :-p

Rats!I hate mis-spelling

Daniel.
 
Ya...and mine is not "sqeeze therom" but "squeeze theorem"...

I did both wrong haha...
 
Back
Top