The Meaning of TM11 and TE10/TE01 Modes

  • Thread starter Thread starter freesnow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Modes
AI Thread Summary
The lowest order TM and TE modes are TM11 and TE10 (or TE01) due to their unique standing wave characteristics and boundary conditions in waveguides. The expression for superposition of two uniform plane waves reveals that the electric field can be zero at specific points, allowing for the placement of conducting sheets without violating boundary conditions. This results in a defined number of half wavelengths between the plates, illustrating the physical constraints of the modes. Extending this reasoning to three dimensions confirms that TM11 and TE10/TE01 are the lowest possible modes based on their mathematical expressions. Understanding these modes is crucial for analyzing wave propagation in various waveguide structures.
freesnow
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Why is the lowest order TM and TE mode TM11 and TE10(or TE01)? What is the physical meaning of the different orders of the modes?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm going to guess this belongs in the homework section and definitely need more information needs to be provided, like what is the waveguide?
 
no, this is not homework, my lecture notes said the lowest order needs to be TM11 and TE10(or TE01), but I don't really understand it.
 
If you consider the expression for the superposition of two uniform plane waves propagating symmetrically with respect to the z-axis, you will see that it contains a factor in the form of sin(\beta x \ cos\ \theta). This factor describes the the standing wave character (here, in the x-direction). When this factor is zero (i.e., when \beta x \ cos\ \theta =\ m\pi where m = 0, 1, 2, 3, ...) the electric field is, of course, also zero.

This is interesting because it means we can place two perfectly conducting sheets in the planes x = 0 and x = m\lambda /(2\ cos\ \theta), without violating the boundary conditions (i.e., zero tangential electric field etc).

The fields will have m number of one-half apparent wavelengths in the x-direction between the plates.

This line of reasoning can be extended to a three-dimensional case where a quick glance at the field expressions for TE and TM waves will reveal why TM1,1 and TE1,0 or 0,1 are the lowest possible modes. Plug in m=n=0 for in the expression for TE waves or m = 0 or n = 0 for TM waves and see what happens.
 
Last edited:
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...

Similar threads

Back
Top