The Moon's Rotation and Why it Doesn't Spin: Theories and Explanations

  • Thread starter Thread starter godzilla7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moon
AI Thread Summary
The Moon does not spin on its own axis due to gravitational locking, resulting in it showing only one side to Earth as it completes its orbit approximately every 28 days. This phenomenon occurs because the Moon's rotation period matches its orbital period, a result of tidal forces over time. The discussion also touches on Uranus, which does rotate but has a unique axial tilt compared to other planets, leading to confusion about its rotation dynamics. Theories suggest that both the Moon and Uranus may have formed from similar materials within the solar system, although Uranus's tilt and behavior are distinct. Overall, the gravitational interactions play a crucial role in the rotational characteristics of celestial bodies.
godzilla7
I've seen this mentioned on another post but some questions remain, the Earth rotates about it's axis as I understand it and the moon rotates about the Earth every 28 ish days, the moon has no axis rotation so we only see one side of the moon, is that right?

This I can grasp, however why doesn't the moon spin is this because according to one theory when it was spewed from the Earth it had no spin and forces do not cause it to have a spin of it's own? or is there some balancing factor that stops it rotating about it's own axis.

Uranus doesn't spin about it's own axis( I think that's right) and is also a wandering planet, it is theorised, caught by our sun so never had any initial rotation, any similarities here. Any thoughts?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
If the moon did not spin on its axis we would see the other side. Think about it!

The rotation of the moon has become gravitationaly locked to its revolution about the earth. The moon rotates once every 28 days therefore we see only one side of it.

You can observe this easily. Simply observe some moveable object on your right. Pick it up and move it without rotation to your left. You will now be looking at the other side of the object.
 
godzilla7 said:
I've seen this mentioned on another post but some questions remain, the Earth rotates about it's axis as I understand it and the moon rotates about the Earth every 28 ish days, the moon has no axis rotation so we only see one side of the moon, is that right?
The Moon rotates every 28 days. It happens that its rotation on its own axis and its revolution around Earth are exactly the same. This is not a coincidence.

godzilla7 said:
...is there some balancing factor that stops it rotating about it's own axis.
Yes, it is called a tidal or gravitational lock. If you park a satellite (or anything) in orbit, and don't bother to correct its tilt, it will eventually point itself so that its long axis is pointing toward Earth - simple orbital mechanics. The Moon is not perfectly spherical. Over eons, this has slowed it rotation until it has one side facing toward Earth. If you measured the Moon it would be slightly bigger along a line parallel to the Earth-Moon axis, than if you measured it cross-wise.


godzilla7 said:
Uranus doesn't spin about it's own axis( I think that's right)
Uranus rotates in 17h 24m, according to Wikipedia.
 
To spin off integral's model...(excuse the pun)...

Get 2 coins to represent the Earth and Moon. Have the moon's face pointing at the Earth. Now move the moon around (orbit) the Earth but keep the face pointing to it all the way around. See how it has to rotate to keep one side facing the earth?
 
godzilla7 said:
Uranus doesn't spin about it's own axis( I think that's right)

As noted above, Uranus does rotate on an axis (sounds crude, eh?).
The odd thing about it's axis is that it is dramatically tilted compared to the other planets.

and is also a wandering planet, it is theorised, caught by our sun so never had any initial rotation, any similarities here.

As far as I know, the theory is that Uranus formed from the same stuff as the rest of this solar system. Where did you hear that it originated from somewhere other than this solar system?
 
Pluto is often considered a captured body. Its orbit is eccentric compared to the other planets - for a brief time it is actually inside Neptune's orbit (as it was between 1979 and 1999. Its orbit is also and highly inclined (>10 degrees) wrt the solar plane.
 
Phobos said:
As far as I know, the theory is that Uranus formed from the same stuff as the rest of this solar system.
Would be very weird if it weren't, seeing as it is visually almost indistinguishable from Neptune.
 
there is the oddity of mercury's perihelion in contrast...something like 45 odd seconds per mecury year, if I remember right?
 
x8jason8x said:
there is the oddity of mercury's perihelion in contrast...something like 45 odd seconds per mecury year, if I remember right?

Are you talking about the perihelion advance? That's a GR effect.
 
  • #10
x8jason8x said:
there is the oddity of mercury's perihelion in contrast...something like 45 odd seconds per mecury year, if I remember right?

Like SpaceTiger said, that has been explained by General Relativity (see "frame dragging"). When that oddity was first discovered (before GR), it was speculated that there was another hidden planet in the vicinity of Mercury that was affecting its orbit, but Einstein's work solved the mystery.
 
  • #11
I wasn't implying that it was still a mystery per se, just that it's an oddity comparable with the tilt of uranus' axis. I should have elaborated on what I meant, sorry about that...
 
Back
Top