The Mystery of Star Formation: Why Do Gas Clouds Collapse?

AI Thread Summary
Star formation occurs when gas clouds, which contain potential and kinetic energy, collapse due to a density contrast. The collapse is triggered when potential energy overcomes kinetic energy, often initiated by shock waves or perturbation events. The first stars formed from primordial gas clouds, while subsequent generations incorporate heavier elements from earlier stars. The Orion Nebula serves as an example of a region where a supernova has led to active star formation. Understanding the interplay of gravity, density contrasts, and energy loss through radiation is crucial in explaining why gas clouds collapse rather than dissipating indefinitely.
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
stars are formed from gas clouds, these gas clouds posses
potential energy and kinematic energy, they may also exhibit
a density contrast, theory tells us that collapse of the gas
cloud starts when PE overcomes KE, but i can find no explanation
for the trigger to this collapse ,put another way, why don't the
individual molecules just jiggle away for ever?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
wolram said:
stars are formed from gas clouds, these gas clouds posses
potential energy and kinematic energy, they may also exhibit
a density contrast, theory tells us that collapse of the gas
cloud starts when PE overcomes KE, but i can find no explanation
for the trigger to this collapse ,put another way, why don't the
individual molecules just jiggle away for ever?
It usually takes a shock wave or some kind of "pertubation event" to cause at least a "density contrast" (higher) enough for the big G to start a matter accumulation that is stronger than the gases' energy to jiggle away. That would be for the first stars formed, since second + generation stars form from gas clouds plus a considerable amount of heavier elements, sometimes just in the form of dust and sometimes in multi-billion ton clumps of any heavy elements that might be lingering around from the death of the first generation star(s). Short version.
 
The phenomena Labguy described is going on all over the universe, but one example which pops into my head is the Orion nebula. Presumably, there was a large supernova in that vicinity several million (billion?) years ago, and now it is a hotbed for star formation.
 
wolram said:
stars are formed from gas clouds, these gas clouds posses
potential energy and kinematic energy, they may also exhibit
a density contrast, theory tells us that collapse of the gas
cloud starts when PE overcomes KE, but i can find no explanation
for the trigger to this collapse ,put another way, why don't the
individual molecules just jiggle away for ever?
Excellent question!

In addition to Labguy's and enigma's answers, wrt the very early years after matter and radiation decoupled (i.e. the time after the CMB was set free). There were density contrasts (as you say), of total matter (ordinary mass, in this case H and He, PLUS dark matter), left over from the time of inflation. Gravity ensured that, on balance, matter was attracted to regions of higher-than-surroundings density. The dark matter speeded up, passed the region peak density, and shot right on out again (dark matter doesn't collide with itself, or ordinary matter). However the H and He atoms did collide, and in so doing got 'excited' (electrons raised to higher energy levels, atoms got ionised), then 'relaxed' by emitting light (well, some of it was radio waves, IR, UV, ...). The light carried away energy, so the H and He gas 'cooled', and exited the region of peak density slower than the atoms went in. All 'on average', of course, and over-simplified (but not, I hope, too oversimplified).
 
most enlightening, for once i have an unambiguous picture of an event
that i could not fathom, thank you kind lady and gentlemen.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top