- #1
zhermes
- 1,255
- 3
My interests are in astrophysics, so please forgive my ignorance of particle physics.
I've just read Frank Close's book, "Neutrino"---excellent read, I'd recommend it---in which he points out that Ray Davis' first experiments to detect neutrinos from nuclear reactors (with no detections) demonstrated that neutrinos and antineutrinos were different. This is because the detector was only sensitive to neutrinos, and the nuclear processes taking place in the reactor were actually producing antineutrinos.
Anyway, I've been hearing a lot about people exploring whether or not neutrinos are Majorana particles (I think that involves looking at "double beta-decay", for some reason...). So what's the loop-hole that allows neutrinos to be their own anti-particles while still not interacting symmetrically?
Thanks!
z
I've just read Frank Close's book, "Neutrino"---excellent read, I'd recommend it---in which he points out that Ray Davis' first experiments to detect neutrinos from nuclear reactors (with no detections) demonstrated that neutrinos and antineutrinos were different. This is because the detector was only sensitive to neutrinos, and the nuclear processes taking place in the reactor were actually producing antineutrinos.
Anyway, I've been hearing a lot about people exploring whether or not neutrinos are Majorana particles (I think that involves looking at "double beta-decay", for some reason...). So what's the loop-hole that allows neutrinos to be their own anti-particles while still not interacting symmetrically?
Thanks!
z