What is the difference between the phase and argument of a complex number?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the distinction between the phase and argument of complex numbers, particularly in Cartesian form. The phase of a purely imaginary number, such as i*2pi, is correctly identified as pi/2, as it lies on the y-axis, making the angle with the real axis pi/2. However, calculating the argument using arctan(2pi/0) results in an error due to division by zero. The argument is defined case by case, with specific rules for different quadrants and conditions of the real and imaginary parts. Ultimately, the conversation clarifies that while the terms are often used interchangeably, the argument is more accurately defined based on the position of the complex number in the Cartesian plane.
eggshell
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
in cartesian form, a+ ib you can find the phase by doing arctan(b/a).. my question concerns the phase of a purely imaginary number. during a lecture my professor said that the phase of i*2pi= pi/2, he rationalized this by saying that the number lies on the y-axis so the angle between the real axis and the imaginary axis is pi/2. but if you do arctan(2pi/0) you will get an error.. how is he right?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Complex numbers don't have a "phase" they have an "argument" which is defined case by case: if z = x + iy we define \phi = Arg(z) as
arctan(y/x) when x > 0
arctan(y/x)+π when x < 0 and y ≥ 0
arctan(y/x)-π when x < 0 and y < 0
π/2 when x = 0 and y > 0
-π/2 when x = 0 and y < 0
indeterminate when x = 0 and y = 0.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top