The Physics of Friction: Why Rough Wood Has More Friction

AI Thread Summary
Rough wood has more friction due to its surface texture, which includes protrusions that create additional contact points with objects, leading to increased resistance. These "sticky-up bits" act like tiny springs, absorbing energy and causing inefficiencies during movement. In contrast, smooth wood has fewer protrusions, resulting in less energy loss and lower friction. The coefficient of friction for wood can be challenging to measure accurately, often showing poor repeatability. Understanding these dynamics clarifies why rough surfaces tend to produce higher friction.
ShootingStars
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
in my mind i am thinking

smooth wood - more contact between object and surface - more friction
rough wood - less contact b/t object and surface - less friction

can someone explain why this is wrong; why rough wood has more friction?
i know rough wood WOULD have more friction but need to know why...

btw i am in physics 11, so please do not explain in terms i can't understand >_<
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi ShootingStars! :smile:

I'd say the rough wood has more sticky-up bits, and they get pushed out of the way like tiny springs, and bounce back, and that is inefficient and wastes energy …

smooth wood has fewer or smaller sticky-up bits, and so less energy is wasted. :wink:
 


If you don't get into serious plastic deformation, fricrion is almost independent of contact area. Can you provide any data about your question? The coefficient for wood is usually difficult to measure and has poor repeatability.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top