The picture in the addition, you see one integral equation and I have

opeth_35
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
The picture in the addition, you see one integral equation and I have moved forward to solve it but when I tried to use patial integrant ( uv-∫v.du) I couldn't go further, Is there anyone to help me solving that equation.Actually, I stuck while putting the boundries
(from 0 to ∞ ) because it is not clear when sinus function goes ∞ what it will be,... anyway if you look at it you will see what I mean.

thanks
 

Attachments

  • DSC_0227.jpg
    DSC_0227.jpg
    22.9 KB · Views: 398
Physics news on Phys.org


th answer is (a*a)/(2*(1+a*a))
 


I think most people think that doesn't worth to give any answer to this easy question· i understand now
 

Thread 'Prof Mike Wiest's proposed link between quantum and consciousness'

I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
View full post »

Thread 'Quantum Entanglement is a Kinematic Fact, not a Dynamical Effect'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
View full post »

Thread 'Is It Known For Sure Infinites In QFT Are Caused Using a Continuum?'

I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Understanding how to derive the Feynman rules out of the path integral
Replies
33
Views
6K
I How to interpret integration by parts
Replies
11
Views
2K
A Solving renormalization group equation in QFT
Replies
5
Views
2K
I How does one compute the Fourier-Transform of the Dirac-Hamiltonian?
Replies
6
Views
2K
I Integration of the Outer Product of a Basis
Replies
1
Views
2K
A Derive the Principle of Least Action from the Path Integral?
Replies
5
Views
3K
I How Does Shankar Transition from Sums to Integrals in Feynman Path Integrals?
Replies
2
Views
1K
I A, a† etc. within integrals: does it have to be so hard?
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Triple equation for integral on a graph
Replies
3
Views
3K
A Question about equivalence of Path Integral and Schrodinger
Replies
19
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top