The puzzling discovery of a motor made from liquid film

AI Thread Summary
Researchers at Sharif University of Technology discovered that a thin film of water can rotate when subjected to two perpendicular electric fields, creating what they term a "liquid film motor." This rotation is not caused by convection or ion movement, as variations in the electric fields and the addition of salt do not affect the phenomenon. The effect occurs in polar liquids, suggesting that the intrinsic dipole moment of the molecules is key to the rotation. This discovery could have significant implications for industrial applications in microfluidic devices for mixing. The exact mechanism behind the rotation remains unclear, highlighting the need for further investigation.
SF
Here’s an interesting effect discovered by a group of Iranian physicists at Sharif University of Technology in Tehran, Iran (it’s not often we hear from these guys).

They placed a thin film of water in a square cell and applied two perpendicular electric fields. One was an external electric field. For the other, they used two copper electrodes to generate a voltage across the cell like an electrolysing cell (although no chemical reaction took place).

So they had a pair of electric fields at right angles acting on this thin film.

The unexpected result is that the film of water begins to rotate. The team has a number of movies of the effect on its website. They call it a liquid film motor and it’s a quite extraordinary effect. At one point they divide their cell into nine smaller ones and the liquid in each cell rotates in exactly the same way.

The question is: what’s causing the rotation? The team can easily control the direction and speed of rotation by varying the relative angle and direction of the electric fields, which rules out the possibility that convection is causing the rotation (something that is seen when a field is applied to some thin films of liquid crystals). Neither does adding salt to water change the effect, ruling out the possibility that ion movement directs the flow.

The rotation occurs in polar liquids but not in non-polar ones so the intrinsic dipole moment of the molecules seems to be crucial. People have been observing the electrohydrodynamics of various types of thin films for a good few years but nobody has seen anything like this. Just what’s going on remains a mystery.

But the puzzle shouldn’t overshadow what looks like an important discovery that could have widespread industrial application in microfluidic devices for mixing.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0805.0490: A Liquid Film Motor

Src: http://arxivblog.com/?p=401
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Interesting, for sure. One hint may be in the final sentence:

"Any efforts to rotate a bulk of liquid was defeated. The fact that only thin liquid films rotate notably and that rotation can not be observed in relatively thick films even at high fields, implies that this phenomenon is a surface effect."

It's not clear from the paper if they tried doing this with a pure fluid- no mention was made of how to keep the fluid uncontaminated.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top