The quantum computer: computer of the future

JKLM
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Has anyone heard of RSA? Its the cipher used by the NSA, CIA and probably most other government agencies. Its a cipher that uses one way arithimetic(easy to do almost impossible to undo). Anyway a type of computer is being developed to crack this form cipher called the Quantum computer and I was interested if anyone had any idea how a quantum computer works and how for they are in developing them.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last I heard the largest quantum computer only had about 8-bits which means that it has less calculating power than your fingers. Yes I do have a rough idea of te theory that allows quantum computing to work and it's important to note that a quantum computer can only perform some operations, for example the factorisaton of a very large numebr into it's prime factors, in a shorter time than a normal computer.


There are so many diffficulties associated with maintaining many particle entangled systems that it is not clear yet if quantum computing is practical.
 
A Quantum computer works not on the same basics of a Turing machine, so even those 8 bits are faster than you think. Quantum computers work because they routinely calculate infinite possibilities to arrive at a solution. *That's* why it's so fast. The reason it can handle infinitely large amounts of numbers is because the photon that hits the atom, turning it so that it represents a 1 or 0 in a normal computer, bounces off with an infinite number of possible directions, meaning the atom has an infinite number of possible orienatations. The possible states of an array are about 2 followed by 1,000 zeroes, or larger than the number of atoms in the known universe.
 
Originally posted by Beren
A Quantum computer works not on the same basics of a Turing machine, so even those 8 bits are faster than you think. Quantum computers work because they routinely calculate infinite possibilities to arrive at a solution. *That's* why it's so fast. The reason it can handle infinitely large amounts of numbers is because the photon that hits the atom, turning it so that it represents a 1 or 0 in a normal computer, bounces off with an infinite number of possible directions, meaning the atom has an infinite number of possible orienatations. The possible states of an array are about 2 followed by 1,000 zeroes, or larger than the number of atoms in the known universe.

No, 8 qubits is still alsost completely worthless for pratical appliactions.

Your wrong about how a quantum computer works, a qubit just like a normal bit in a classical computer can only have two states: 1 and 0, the difference is that it may be in a suppostion of the 1 and 0 states.

An important the thing missed by most people about quantum computers is that due to the fact that you have to collapse the entangled state in order to take a measurement, they perform most operations at the same speed as a classical computer and it's only a few operations (like the factorisations of a large number into it's primes) that it can erform faster than a normal computer.
 
Interestingly, (or not interestingly, depending on your point of view), it was quantum computers that led me here today. I was doing my physics homework and I remembered an article in The New Scientist that I read about quantum computers. So I decided to learn more about them, what I found was easy to understand but then all kinds of complications like decoherence and entanglement came in, so I thought I'd leave it alone and come back to it when I have a Masters.

Anyway, these are the pages I had a look at, see if the're any good for what you want:

http://www.cs.caltech.edu/~westside/quantum-intro.html
http://www.theory.caltech.edu/~quic/errors.html
http://216.109.117.135/search/cache...zgo8J:www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~jwallace/simtable.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top