The range of a projectile fired up the side of a mountain?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Projectile Range
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the optimal angle \(\theta\) for maximizing the range of a projectile fired up a mountain with a constant slope \(\phi\). Participants explore the application of the standard range formula and suggest an alternative approach by calculating the projectile's trajectory in relation to the mountain's slope. They propose finding the intersection of the projectile's parabolic path with the slope line and using equations of motion to derive the maximum distance traveled. The conversation emphasizes the need for differentiation to identify the maximum distance as a function of time. Ultimately, the goal is to establish a clear relationship between the angles and the maximum range up the mountain.
cj
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
Another question pertaining to a lab that I have to setup...

The range of a projectile fired up the side of a mountain?

At the base of a mountain with a constant slope of
\phi, a projectile is fired from a cannon oriented
at an angle of \theta.

What \theta will result in the maximum range up the
side of the mountain?

What is this maximum range??

- air resistance can be neglected.

---
As a starting point I'm looking at

x_{max}=\frac{v_0^2sin2\alpha}{g}

But am not clear about next steps.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a classic problem.

That said, it's not at all clear that your formula applies to this situation. Perhaps it's easier to calculate the distance the projectile travels in terms of \phi,\theta and v_0 and then find the maximum?
 
Yes, this is the line of thinking I was considering -- but came to a dead-end.

NateTG said:
This is a classic problem.

That said, it's not at all clear that your formula applies to this situation. Perhaps it's easier to calculate the distance the projectile travels in terms of \phi,\theta and v_0 and then find the maximum?
 
Find the equation for the parabola with the correct slope (y as a function of x).
Find the intersection of this parabola with the straight line representing the mountain slope (i.e, find the x-coordinate of the point of intersection).

alternatively, write the equations of motion in terms of normal and tangential components to the mountainside. Determine the time at which the projectile's normal position is again 0.

Anyhow, once you've found this, you may find an equation for distance as a function of the angle that can be maximized.
 
Last edited:
Form a triangle so that you have the slope representing the distance traveled up the mountain.
(u cos theta) t is horizontal distance (theta = angle between initial velocity vector,u, and horizontal) and 1/2 gt ^ 2 is vertical distance on triangle.

distance up mountain = sqrt [ (1/2gt ^2)^ 2 + (u cos theta)^2 t ^ 2]

Since distance up mountain is a function of time:
for maximum distance up mountain

d(distance)/ dt = 0

so d/dt sqrt [ (1/2gt ^2)^ 2 + (u cos theta)^2 t ^ 2]= 0

If phi is angle of mountain slope, then
tan phi = vertical of triangle/ horizontal of triangle
tan phi = 1/2 gt ^ 2 / ( u cos theta) t
so 1/2 gt^2 = (u cos theta) t x tan phi
u cos theta = (1/2 gt)/tan phi

so d/dt sqrt [ (1/2gt ^2)^ 2 + (1/2 gt) ^2/ (tan phi)^2 t ^ 2]= 0
d/dt sqrt [ 1/4 g^2 x t^4 + 1/4g^2 x t^2/ (tan phi)^2 t^2 ]= 0

for constant phi we can evaluate d/dt.


( differentiation can be done using u substitution and chain rule)

substituting the theta and phi for t in the differentiated expression
will give maximum distance projectile travels up mountain.
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top