The resistance in water between two bouys

  • Thread starter Thread starter Order
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resistance Water
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electrical resistance between two half-submerged spherical buoys in water, given their resistivity. The initial calculations suggest a resistance of R = ρ/(2πa), but the correct answer is R = ρ/πa, indicating an overestimation of the current. The participants clarify that the half-submerged condition affects the current distribution, leading to a doubling of resistance due to the geometry of the setup. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the implications of buoyancy and current flow in a semi-infinite medium. Overall, the analysis reveals that the resistance is not dependent on the separation distance between the buoys.
Order
Messages
96
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Two spherical buoys float half submerged in a calm deep sea. Their radius a is very much smaller than their separation b. Calculate the resistance between them if the resistivity of the water is ρ.


Homework Equations


R=V/I
V=\int Edl
I=\sigma \int_S \textbf{E} \cdot d \textbf{S}
\rho = \sigma^{-1}


The Attempt at a Solution


The field between the bouys is
E=\frac{Q}{\varepsilon 4 \pi} \Big(\frac{1}{x^2}-\frac{1}{(b-x)^2} \Big) =E_1+E_2
I already know how to show that
V \simeq \frac{Q}{2 \pi \varepsilon_0} \Big( \frac{1}{a}-\frac{1}{b-a} \Big) \simeq \frac{Q}{a 2 \pi \varepsilon_0}
Now here comes the tricky part and I am not sure what I am doing but it feels like the current between the two bouys should pass a theoretical Earth before reaching each other. The reason for this is that when the two bouys are a distant apart half of their field lines should still join. Is this reasonable? So reasoning like that
I= \sigma \int_{S_{between}} \textbf{E} \cdot d \textbf{S}=2 \sigma \int_{earth} \textbf{E}_1 \cdot d \textbf{S} = \sigma \int_{sphere} \textbf{E}_1 \cdot d \textbf{S} = \frac{Q}{ \rho \varepsilon_0}

And finally
R=V/I=\frac{\rho}{2 \pi a}
But the correct answer is ##R=\frac{\rho}{\pi a}## so I guess I overestimated the current by a factor 2. (Where did it go wrong? I always tend to miss a factor 2 in electromagnetism.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could it be because the spheres are only half submerged? How does that affect the current?
 
gneill said:
Could it be because the spheres are only half submerged? How does that affect the current?

The OP calculated R = half the alleged correct answer but if the spheres are only half submerged then the resistance should be doubled, not halved (since air resistance >> salt water).

Anyway, I wouldn't offhand know how to approach this problem. Interesting that the answer is not a function of b.
 
Ok, I'm glad there was nothing wrong with my calculations or reasoning, but the problem was that I thought the bouys were submerged very Deep in the ocean! (yes the current becomes halved and the resistance doubled.)
 
rude man said:
Interesting that the answer is not a function of b.
Yes - as Order noted, you can treat each sphere separately. Model the ocean as a semi-infinite space (z < 0, say) minus a hemispherical portion, r < a. The resistance of a hemispherical shell radius r > a and thickness dr is ρdr/(2πr2), so the total resistance to infinity is ρ/(2πa). Getting from one sphere to the other involves (in the limit) going out to infinity and back again, giving a total ρ/(πa).
 
Order said:
Ok, I'm glad there was nothing wrong with my calculations or reasoning, but the problem was that I thought the bouys were submerged very Deep in the ocean! (yes the current becomes halved and the resistance doubled.)

Yes. This is a correct assessment.

For a single isolated source of radius a in an infinite ocean,
V=4\pi \rho a I
and for a single isolated sink of radius a in an infinite ocean,
V=-4\pi \rho a I
So, for the combination of a source and a sink, both with the same current I,
ΔV=\pi \rho a (2I)

Because of symmetry, the half-submerged (semi-infinite) problem is the same as the fully submerged problem with the 2I replaced by I.
 
Last edited:
Chestermiller said:
Yes. This is a correct assessment.

For a single isolated source of radius a in an infinite ocean,
V=4\pi \rho a I
and for a single isolated sink of radius a in an infinite ocean,
V=-4\pi \rho a I
So, for the combination of a source and a sink, both with the same current I,
ΔV=\pi \rho a (2I)

Because of symmetry, the half-submerged (semi-infinite) problem is the same as the fully submerged problem with the 2I replaced by I.

Chet, I don't understand: V/I is resistance but your expression is not ohms:
ΔV=\pi \rho a (2I) → ΔV/I = 2πρa which has units of (ohm-m)*(m) = ohm-m^2.
 
rude man said:
Chet, I don't understand: V/I is resistance but your expression is not ohms:
ΔV=\pi \rho a (2I) → ΔV/I = 2πρa which has units of (ohm-m)*(m) = ohm-m^2.

Oops. Thanks rude man. I realized I had made a mistake and was about to correct it when I saw your posting. So, here goes again:

For a single isolated current source of radius a in an infinite ocean,
V=\frac{ρI}{4\pi a}
and for a single isolated current sink of radius a in an infinite ocean,
V=-\frac{ρI}{4\pi a}
So, for the combination of a source and a sink in an infinite ocean, both with the same current I,
ΔV=\frac{ρI}{2\pi a}
Because of symmetry, the half-submerged (semi-infinite) problem is the same as the fully submerged problem with the I replaced by 2I, since, in the infinite ocean problem, half the current goes to the top half of the spheres and half the current goes to the bottom half of the spheres. So, for the half-submerged problem,
ΔV=\frac{ρI}{\pi a}
Sorry for my previous error.

Chet
 
Last edited:
Back
Top