The slope of a kinetic energy vs. potential energy graph

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the slope of a gravitational potential energy versus kinetic energy graph, which the user calculated as -1.4. They are confused about the theoretical slope value, which is -1, and how to compute the percentage error accurately. The user initially calculated a percentage error of 170% using their slope but later found that using -1 as the theoretical slope yields a more reasonable 40% error. The correct relationship is established as P.E. + K.E. = constant, leading to a linear graph with a slope of -1. Clarification is sought on the discrepancies in their calculations and understanding of the slope's significance.
niteeks
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have plotted a graph of Gravitational potential energy (y-axis) vs. kinetic energy (x-axis), and I have found the value of the slope to equal -1.4. The thing is I don't know what the -1.4 equals to? Since I have to find the percentage error, I need to know the theorectical value of the experiment, to put into the equation of % error. I have tried several ways to determine what the value would be like but I don't think they make sense:

The Attempt at a Solution



(kg(m/s^2)m)/((kg(m^2/s^2))/2) which equals finally 2 (theo value)

and when I put into percentage error formula:

(|theo-exp|/|theo|)x100→(2-(-1.4)/2)x100→1.7x100=170% (which is impossible)

or something I found on the internet:

For a freely falling body,
P.E. + K.E. = cosntant
=> x + y = constant, where x = P.E. and y = K.E.
=> P.E. vs. K.E. graph is a line with slope = - 1

I don't understand how -1 should be the theo value of the slope... But it works perfectly in my equation for percentage error!

(|theo-exp|/|theo|)x100→(-1-(-1.4)/-1)x100→0.4x100=40% (which makes more sense)

Could someone help me understand this? And tell me my mistakes? It doesn't make any sense to me! Thanks!

Homework Equations



em=ek+pe
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint:

Write the equation as

PE + KE = C, where C is a constant.

Then put it in the form of y = mx + b

What is m?
 
Uh well "m" equals -1 right?
 
That's correct.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top