The slope of a kinetic energy vs. potential energy graph

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the slope of a gravitational potential energy versus kinetic energy graph, which the user calculated as -1.4. They are confused about the theoretical slope value, which is -1, and how to compute the percentage error accurately. The user initially calculated a percentage error of 170% using their slope but later found that using -1 as the theoretical slope yields a more reasonable 40% error. The correct relationship is established as P.E. + K.E. = constant, leading to a linear graph with a slope of -1. Clarification is sought on the discrepancies in their calculations and understanding of the slope's significance.
niteeks
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have plotted a graph of Gravitational potential energy (y-axis) vs. kinetic energy (x-axis), and I have found the value of the slope to equal -1.4. The thing is I don't know what the -1.4 equals to? Since I have to find the percentage error, I need to know the theorectical value of the experiment, to put into the equation of % error. I have tried several ways to determine what the value would be like but I don't think they make sense:

The Attempt at a Solution



(kg(m/s^2)m)/((kg(m^2/s^2))/2) which equals finally 2 (theo value)

and when I put into percentage error formula:

(|theo-exp|/|theo|)x100→(2-(-1.4)/2)x100→1.7x100=170% (which is impossible)

or something I found on the internet:

For a freely falling body,
P.E. + K.E. = cosntant
=> x + y = constant, where x = P.E. and y = K.E.
=> P.E. vs. K.E. graph is a line with slope = - 1

I don't understand how -1 should be the theo value of the slope... But it works perfectly in my equation for percentage error!

(|theo-exp|/|theo|)x100→(-1-(-1.4)/-1)x100→0.4x100=40% (which makes more sense)

Could someone help me understand this? And tell me my mistakes? It doesn't make any sense to me! Thanks!

Homework Equations



em=ek+pe
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint:

Write the equation as

PE + KE = C, where C is a constant.

Then put it in the form of y = mx + b

What is m?
 
Uh well "m" equals -1 right?
 
That's correct.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top