The Spectral Theorem for Unbounded Operators in Quantum Mechanics

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mrandersdk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qm Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the rigorous formulation of the spectral theorem for unbounded operators in quantum mechanics, particularly in relation to the resolution of identity. The user seeks clarification on how the integral representation of the identity operator, expressed as I = ∫σ(I) λ dE(λ), is constructed and its connection to the inner product formulation. The conversation highlights the importance of the Stieltjes-Lebesgue integral in this context and references a theorem stating that a self-adjoint operator A in a Hilbert space possesses a unique spectral resolution. The user also requests references for proofs and explanations regarding spectral projections and their calculations for various operators.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of C*-algebras and operator theory
  • Familiarity with spectral measures and self-adjoint operators
  • Knowledge of Stieltjes and Lebesgue integrals
  • Basic concepts of quantum mechanics and Hilbert spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the rigorous formulation of the spectral theorem for unbounded operators
  • Study the properties of spectral measures and their applications in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the connection between Stieltjes integrals and quantum mechanical inner products
  • Investigate spectral projections for various operators beyond position operators
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and graduate students specializing in quantum mechanics, functional analysis, and operator theory will benefit from this discussion.

mrandersdk
Messages
243
Reaction score
1
On wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borel_functional_calculus in the paragraf 'Resolution of the identity' there is said

'In physics literature, using the above as heuristic, one passes to the case when the spectral measure is no longer discrete and write the resolution of identity as ... '

How is this made rigorous. I had had a course in C*-algebras and proven the spectral theorem for bounded operators, I know most of physical are unbounded, but there must be a connection?

How is it constructed such that

[tex]I = \int_{\sigma (I)} \lambda d E(\lambda)[/tex]

makes sence. I guess somehow taking the inner product with a bra and a ket should get me something like

[tex]<\phi|T|\psi> = \int <\phi|x><x|T|\psi> dx[/tex]

so comparing this with

[tex]<\phi|T|\psi> = <\phi| \int_{\sigma (I)} \lambda d E(\lambda) T |\psi>[/tex]

how do I revieve the lebesgue measure, from the resolution of identity, and see that this is the same, if it even is. I hope it is clear what my problem is?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You might find this reference handy. In particular, appendix B section 6.5 defines this integral to be computed 'pointwise':

THEOREM: A selfadjoint operator [itex]A[/itex] in a Hilbert space [itex]\mathcal{H}[/itex] possesses a unique spectral resolution [itex]\{ E_\alpha \}[/itex] such that
[tex]A = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \alpha dE_\alpha,[/tex]​
meaning that for each [itex]\psi[/itex] in the domain [itex]\mathcal{D}_A[/itex] one has the convergent Stieltjes integral
[tex](\psi, A\psi) = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \alpha d(\psi, E_\alpha\psi).[/tex]​
 
This seems very interesting. They state a new form of the theorem, saying that you actually get a Stieltjes-Lebesgue integral when taking the iner product.

And as a example the make the spectral projections for X, so it makes sence. Have I understood it right.

Do you any refferences where they proof this form of the spectral theorem, and where they explaine why the spectral projection fx of X is

[tex](E_{x_0}\psi)(x) = \psi(x)[/tex]

and why this leads to

[tex]d(\psi,E_{x}\psi)= ||\psi(x)||^2 dx[/tex]

and can this be made general to

[tex]d(\phi,E_{x}\psi)= \phi^*(x) \psi(x) dx[/tex].

And maybe how the spectral projection is calculated for other operators.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K