The spectrum of the blue part in a candle flame

Kamakiri
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In the spectrum of the blue part in a candle flame, there’s a violet emission at 432 nm due to excited CH* molecules (chemiluminescence). Why 432? Why not 400 or 500? There are emissions at 436, 475 and 520 nm too. Why these numbers?

2. The attempt at a solution
Is it because the energies of the photons emitted correspond to these wavelengths, as E = hc/λ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kamakiri said:

Homework Statement


In the spectrum of the blue part in a candle flame, there’s a violet emission at 432 nm due to excited CH* molecules (chemiluminescence). Why 432? Why not 400 or 500? There are emissions at 436, 475 and 520 nm too. Why these numbers?

2. The attempt at a solution
Is it because the energies of the photons emitted correspond to these wavelengths, as E = hc/λ?

Why do the Balmer lines in the Hydrogen spectrum have the wavelengths that they have? If you know the answer to that question, you know why CH* emits at the wavelengths that it does.
 
Quantum Defect said:
Why do the Balmer lines in the Hydrogen spectrum have the wavelengths that they have? If you know the answer to that question, you know why CH* emits at the wavelengths that it does.
I read about Balmer lines. The H-alpha spectral line of hydrogen gas is red, since the energy of the photons emitted correspond to 656.3 nm, as E = hc/λ. Is that right?
 
Kamakiri said:
I read about Balmer lines. The H-alpha spectral line of hydrogen gas is red, since the energy of the photons emitted correspond to 656.3 nm, as E = hc/λ. Is that right?

Yes, you can find out the photon energy the way that you cite, but why that wavelength, and not 670 nm? Why are all of these spectral lines discrete? What is it about the energies of atoms and molecules that are so different from what we ar used to for automobiles, cats, and footballs?
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top